Suppr超能文献

中风后康复与恢复性护理的利用情况:退伍军人事务部社区生活中心与退伍军人事务部签约的社区疗养院之比较

Poststroke Rehabilitation and Restorative Care Utilization: A Comparison Between VA Community Living Centers and VA-contracted Community Nursing Homes.

作者信息

Jia Huanguang, Pei Qinglin, Sullivan Charles T, Cowper Ripley Diane C, Wu Samuel S, Bates Barbara E, Vogel W Bruce, Bidelspach Douglas E, Wang Xinping, Hoffman Nannette

机构信息

*Center of Innovation on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System (NF/SGVHS), Gainesville, FL †Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Albany VA Medical Center, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY ‡Department of Veterans Affairs, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service (PM&R), Washington, DC §Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, FL.

出版信息

Med Care. 2016 Mar;54(3):235-42. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000494.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective poststroke rehabilitation care can speed patient recovery and minimize patient functional disabilities. Veterans affairs (VA) community living centers (CLCs) and VA-contracted community nursing homes (CNHs) are the 2 major sources of institutional long-term care for Veterans with stroke receiving care under VA auspices.

OBJECTIVES

This study compares rehabilitation therapy and restorative nursing care among Veterans residing in VA CLCs versus those Veterans in VA-contracted CNHs.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Retrospective observational.

SUBJECTS

All Veterans diagnosed with stroke, newly admitted to the CLCs or CNHs during the study period who completed at least 2 Minimum Data Set assessments postadmission.

MEASURES

The outcomes were numbers of days for rehabilitation therapy and restorative nursing care received by the Veterans during their stays in CLCs or CNHs as documented in the Minimum Data Set databases.

RESULTS

For rehabilitation therapy, the CLC Veterans had lower user rates (75.2% vs. 76.4%, P=0.078) and fewer observed therapy days (4.9 vs. 6.4, P<0.001) than CNH Veterans. However, the CLC Veterans had higher adjusted odds for therapy (odds ratio=1.16, P=0.033), although they had fewer average therapy days (coefficient=-1.53±0.11, P<0.001). For restorative nursing care, CLC Veterans had higher user rates (33.5% vs. 30.6%, P<0.001), more observed average care days (9.4 vs. 5.9, P<0.001), higher adjusted odds (odds ratio=2.28, P<0.001), and more adjusted days for restorative nursing care (coefficient=5.48±0.37, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with their counterparts at VA-contracted CNHs, Veterans at VA CLCs had fewer average rehabilitation therapy days (both unadjusted and adjusted), but they were significantly more likely to receive restorative nursing care both before and after risk adjustment.

摘要

背景

有效的中风后康复护理可加速患者康复并最大程度减少患者功能残疾。退伍军人事务部(VA)社区生活中心(CLC)和VA签约的社区疗养院(CNH)是在VA主持下接受护理的中风退伍军人机构长期护理的两大来源。

目的

本研究比较了居住在VA CLC的退伍军人与VA签约的CNH中的退伍军人的康复治疗和恢复性护理情况。

研究设计

回顾性观察研究。

研究对象

所有在研究期间新入住CLC或CNH且入院后至少完成2次最低数据集评估的被诊断为中风的退伍军人。

测量指标

结果为退伍军人在CLC或CNH住院期间接受康复治疗和恢复性护理的天数,如最低数据集数据库中所记录。

结果

在康复治疗方面,与CNH退伍军人相比,CLC退伍军人的使用率较低(75.2%对76.4%,P=0.078),观察到的治疗天数较少(4.9天对6.4天,P<0.001)。然而,CLC退伍军人接受治疗的调整后优势比更高(优势比=1.16,P=0.033),尽管他们的平均治疗天数较少(系数=-1.53±0.11,P<0.001)。在恢复性护理方面,CLC退伍军人的使用率更高(33.5%对30.6%,P<0.001),观察到的平均护理天数更多(9.4天对5.9天,P<0.001),调整后优势比更高(优势比=2.28,P<0.001),恢复性护理的调整天数更多(系数=5.48±0.37,P<0.001)。

结论

与VA签约的CNH中的退伍军人相比,VA CLC中的退伍军人平均康复治疗天数较少(未调整和调整后均如此),但在风险调整前后,他们接受恢复性护理的可能性显著更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验