Olsen Jørn
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, Aarhus, Denmark.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 Mar;42(2):175-6. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3548. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
The time between marriage and the birth of the first child has been used by demographers as a measure of fecundity, but such a measure only works if cohabitation and wanting to have a child are closely linked to marriage. In a world where pregnancies can be planned for those who have access to safe contraception methods, couples may know their "time-to-pregnancy" (TTP) as the waiting time from when they stopped using contraceptive methods until becoming pregnant or being classified as infertile (a period of ≥ 12 months). This TTP measure was first used in 1981 (1) as a measure of couple fecundity and it has been applied widely with success and failure in many areas of research including work-related fecundity problems (2, 3, 4). In this letter, some less well-known limitations of the TTP measure are discussed.
人口统计学家将结婚与第一个孩子出生之间的时间用作生育力的一种衡量标准,但只有在同居和想要孩子与婚姻紧密相关时,这种衡量标准才有效。在一个那些能够获得安全避孕方法的人可以计划怀孕的世界里,夫妻可能知道他们的“怀孕等待时间”(TTP),即从停止使用避孕方法到怀孕或被归类为不孕(≥12个月的时间段)的等待时间。这种TTP衡量标准于1981年首次被用作夫妻生育力的一种衡量标准,并且在包括与工作相关的生育力问题等许多研究领域中得到了广泛应用,有成功也有失败。在这封信中,将讨论TTP衡量标准一些不太为人所知的局限性。