Lonic Daniel, Morris David E, Lo Lun-Jou
From the *Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Craniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; and †The Craniofacial Center, University of Illinois at Chicago and Shriners Hospital for Children, Chicago, IL.
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Feb;77 Suppl 1:S25-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000708.
Because primary nasal correction by the time of lip repair has been incorporated into the treatment approach, many patients have benefitted from this combined procedure. However, primary nasal correction cannot guarantee an excellent result. Although overcorrection has been mentioned as a treatment rationale of the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity, a detailed approach and quantitative evidence of the rationale are rare. This study evaluates whether overcorrection in the primary repair results in a quantitative improvement in nasal appearance.
In this retrospective study, the inclusion criteria were patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who underwent primary lip and nose repair by the age of 3 to 4 months. Primary nasal overcorrection was achieved by application of muscle to septal base suture, alar cinching suture and Tajima reversed U incision method. Patients were further divided into an overcorrected (n = 19) and nonovercorrected group (n = 19). The following parameters were identified on basilar photos of all patients taken at least 12 months after repair, ratios of cleft to noncleft side in each patient were taken and the mean for each parameter calculated: Ac angle (ACA/ACA'), alar height (AH/AH'), alar width (AW/AW'), nostril height (NH/NH`), nostril width (NW/NW'), and columellar deviation from the midline (CD/NW). The means of the overcorrected and nonovercorrected groups were then compared using the t test.
From all investigated measuremens, Alar height (AH/AH': overcorrected, 0.983 to nonovercorrected, 0.941; P = 0.03) and nostril height ratio (NH/NH') (NH/NH': covercorrected, 0.897 to nonovercorrected, 0.680; P = 0.003) showed statistically significant differences favoring the overcorrected group at least 12 months after surgery.
Primary nasal overcorrection including muscle to columella base suture, alar cinch suture, and Tajima method resulted in quantitatively more long-term symmetric alae and nostril height compared to nonovercorrected patients.
由于在唇裂修复时同期进行一期鼻畸形矫正已被纳入治疗方案,许多患者受益于这种联合手术。然而,一期鼻畸形矫正并不能保证获得极佳的效果。尽管过度矫正已被提及作为单侧唇裂鼻畸形的一种治疗理论依据,但关于该理论依据的详细方法和定量证据却很少见。本研究评估一期修复中的过度矫正是否能在鼻外观上带来定量的改善。
在这项回顾性研究中,纳入标准为年龄在3至4个月时接受一期唇裂和鼻畸形修复的完全性单侧唇腭裂患者。通过应用肌肉至鼻中隔基部缝合、鼻翼缩紧缝合和 Tajima 反向 U 形切口法实现一期鼻过度矫正。患者进一步分为过度矫正组(n = 19)和未过度矫正组(n = 19)。在修复后至少12个月拍摄的所有患者的基底照片上确定以下参数,测量每位患者患侧与健侧的比例,并计算每个参数的平均值:鼻唇角(ACA/ACA')、鼻翼高度(AH/AH')、鼻翼宽度(AW/AW')、鼻孔高度(NH/NH`)、鼻孔宽度(NW/NW')以及鼻中隔偏离中线的程度(CD/NW)。然后使用 t 检验比较过度矫正组和未过度矫正组的平均值。
在所有调查测量中,鼻翼高度(AH/AH':过度矫正组为0.983,未过度矫正组为0.941;P = 0.03)和鼻孔高度比例(NH/NH')(NH/NH':过度矫正组为0.897,未过度矫正组为0.680;P = 0.003)在术后至少12个月时显示出有利于过度矫正组的统计学显著差异。
与未过度矫正的患者相比,包括肌肉至鼻中隔基部缝合、鼻翼缩紧缝合和 Tajima 法在内的一期鼻过度矫正在长期能使鼻翼和鼻孔高度在定量上更加对称。