Lee Andy C H, Drake David B, DeGeorge Brent R
From the Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):524-31. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000680.
Upper- and lower-extremity peripheral neuropathies are commonly encountered in the primary care setting and account for 14.3 million specialist referrals in the United States annually. Despite the integral role of plastic surgeons in the development of the field of peripheral nerve surgery, plastic surgeons are not commonly recognized as peripheral nerve specialists. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pattern of diagnosis, treatment, and referral of upper- and lower-extremity peripheral nerve entrapment syndromes by both medical students and primary care providers.
An online survey including 5 peripheral nerve entrapment clinical scenarios (2 upper extremity and 3 lower extremity) was administered to medical students and primary care providers at a large academic medical center. Respondents were surveyed for level of training, prior clinical exposure, initial diagnostic studies of choice, initial therapeutic modalities of choice, need for subspecialty referral, and appropriate surgical subspecialists for management of the peripheral nerve entrapment.
Overall, 248 medical students (38.3% response rate) and 54 primary care providers (13.5% response rate) completed the study. The majority of medical students and primary care providers indicated prior clinical experience with upper-extremity peripheral nerve entrapment in contrast to lower-extremity peripheral nerve entrapment with 26.2% and 39.9% of medical students and primary care physicians reporting prior clinical exposure, respectively. Medical students and primary care providers identified orthopedic surgery as the preferred choice for subspecialty referral for both upper- and lower-extremity peripheral nerve entrapment. Primary care physicians are more inclined to initially manage upper-extremity nerve entrapment without referral to other specialties than for the management of lower-extremity nerve entrapment; 38.0% and 61.1% of the primary care physicians surveyed would refer to another specialty for the initial management of carpal tunnel and cubital tunnel syndromes, in contrast to 83.0%, 90.0%, and 88.2% for the management of common peroneal nerve compression, sural nerve compression, and deep peroneal nerve compression, respectively.
We contend that early education of medical students and primary care providers regarding the role of plastic surgeons as peripheral nerve specialists may improve future referral patterns.
上肢和下肢周围神经病变在基层医疗环境中很常见,在美国每年有1430万例专科转诊。尽管整形外科医生在周围神经外科领域的发展中发挥着不可或缺的作用,但整形外科医生通常不被视为周围神经专科医生。本研究的目的是调查医学生和基层医疗服务提供者对上、下肢周围神经卡压综合征的诊断、治疗和转诊模式。
在一家大型学术医疗中心,对医学生和基层医疗服务提供者进行了一项在线调查,其中包括5种周围神经卡压临床病例(2种上肢病例和3种下肢病例)。调查对象的培训水平、既往临床接触情况、首选的初始诊断研究、首选的初始治疗方式、是否需要专科转诊以及适合管理周围神经卡压的外科专科医生。
总体而言,248名医学生(回复率38.3%)和54名基层医疗服务提供者(回复率13.5%)完成了研究。与下肢周围神经卡压相比,大多数医学生和基层医疗服务提供者表示有上肢周围神经卡压的既往临床经验,分别有26.2%的医学生和39.9%的基层医疗医生报告有既往临床接触。医学生和基层医疗服务提供者都认为骨科手术是上肢和下肢周围神经卡压专科转诊的首选。基层医疗医生更倾向于在不转诊到其他专科的情况下,对上肢神经卡压进行初始管理,而不是对下肢神经卡压进行管理;在接受调查的基层医疗医生中,38.0%和61.1%的医生会将腕管综合征和肘管综合征的初始管理转诊到其他专科,相比之下,腓总神经卡压、腓肠神经卡压和腓深神经卡压的转诊率分别为83.0%、90.0%和88.2%。
我们认为,早期对医学生和基层医疗服务提供者进行关于整形外科医生作为周围神经专科医生的作用的教育,可能会改善未来的转诊模式。