Tosas Auguet Olga, Betley Jason R, Stabler Richard A, Patel Amita, Ioannou Avgousta, Marbach Helene, Hearn Pasco, Aryee Anna, Goldenberg Simon D, Otter Jonathan A, Desai Nergish, Karadag Tacim, Grundy Chris, Gaunt Michael W, Cooper Ben S, Edgeworth Jonathan D, Kypraios Theodore
Centre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
PLoS Med. 2016 Jan 26;13(1):e1001944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001944. eCollection 2016 Jan.
Identifying and tackling the social determinants of infectious diseases has become a public health priority following the recognition that individuals with lower socioeconomic status are disproportionately affected by infectious diseases. In many parts of the world, epidemiologically and genotypically defined community-associated (CA) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains have emerged to become frequent causes of hospital infection. The aim of this study was to use spatial models with adjustment for area-level hospital attendance to determine the transmission niche of genotypically defined CA- and health-care-associated (HA)-MRSA strains across a diverse region of South East London and to explore a potential link between MRSA carriage and markers of social and material deprivation.
This study involved spatial analysis of cross-sectional data linked with all MRSA isolates identified by three National Health Service (NHS) microbiology laboratories between 1 November 2011 and 29 February 2012. The cohort of hospital-based NHS microbiology diagnostic services serves 867,254 usual residents in the Lambeth, Southwark, and Lewisham boroughs in South East London, United Kingdom (UK). Isolates were classified as HA- or CA-MRSA based on whole genome sequencing. All MRSA cases identified over 4 mo within the three-borough catchment area (n = 471) were mapped to small geographies and linked to area-level aggregated socioeconomic and demographic data. Disease mapping and ecological regression models were used to infer the most likely transmission niches for each MRSA genetic classification and to describe the spatial epidemiology of MRSA in relation to social determinants. Specifically, we aimed to identify demographic and socioeconomic population traits that explain cross-area extra variation in HA- and CA-MRSA relative risks following adjustment for hospital attendance data. We explored the potential for associations with the English Indices of Deprivation 2010 (including the Index of Multiple Deprivation and several deprivation domains and subdomains) and the 2011 England and Wales census demographic and socioeconomic indicators (including numbers of households by deprivation dimension) and indicators of population health. Both CA-and HA-MRSA were associated with household deprivation (CA-MRSA relative risk [RR]: 1.72 [1.03-2.94]; HA-MRSA RR: 1.57 [1.06-2.33]), which was correlated with hospital attendance (Pearson correlation coefficient [PCC] = 0.76). HA-MRSA was also associated with poor health (RR: 1.10 [1.01-1.19]) and residence in communal care homes (RR: 1.24 [1.12-1.37]), whereas CA-MRSA was linked with household overcrowding (RR: 1.58 [1.04-2.41]) and wider barriers, which represent a combined score for household overcrowding, low income, and homelessness (RR: 1.76 [1.16-2.70]). CA-MRSA was also associated with recent immigration to the UK (RR: 1.77 [1.19-2.66]). For the area-level variation in RR for CA-MRSA, 28.67% was attributable to the spatial arrangement of target geographies, compared with only 0.09% for HA-MRSA. An advantage to our study is that it provided a representative sample of usual residents receiving care in the catchment areas. A limitation is that relationships apparent in aggregated data analyses cannot be assumed to operate at the individual level.
There was no evidence of community transmission of HA-MRSA strains, implying that HA-MRSA cases identified in the community originate from the hospital reservoir and are maintained by frequent attendance at health care facilities. In contrast, there was a high risk of CA-MRSA in deprived areas linked with overcrowding, homelessness, low income, and recent immigration to the UK, which was not explainable by health care exposure. Furthermore, areas adjacent to these deprived areas were themselves at greater risk of CA-MRSA, indicating community transmission of CA-MRSA. This ongoing community transmission could lead to CA-MRSA becoming the dominant strain types carried by patients admitted to hospital, particularly if successful hospital-based MRSA infection control programmes are maintained. These results suggest that community infection control programmes targeting transmission of CA-MRSA will be required to control MRSA in both the community and hospital. These epidemiological changes will also have implications for effectiveness of risk-factor-based hospital admission MRSA screening programmes.
在认识到社会经济地位较低的个体受传染病影响尤为严重之后,识别和应对传染病的社会决定因素已成为公共卫生的重点。在世界许多地区,从流行病学和基因分型上定义的社区相关性(CA)耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌株已成为医院感染的常见病因。本研究的目的是使用空间模型,并对地区层面的医院就诊情况进行调整,以确定在伦敦东南部一个多样化地区,基因分型定义的CA-MRSA菌株和医疗保健相关性(HA)-MRSA菌株的传播生态位,并探索MRSA携带情况与社会和物质匮乏指标之间的潜在联系。
本研究对2011年11月1日至2012年2月29日期间,由三个国民保健服务(NHS)微生物实验室鉴定的所有MRSA分离株的横断面数据进行了空间分析。基于医院的NHS微生物诊断服务队列服务于英国伦敦东南部兰贝斯、南华克和刘易舍姆行政区的867,254名常住居民。根据全基因组测序将分离株分类为HA-MRSA或CA-MRSA。在三个行政区服务区域内4个月内确定的所有MRSA病例(n = 471)被绘制到小地理区域,并与地区层面汇总的社会经济和人口数据相关联。使用疾病绘图和生态回归模型来推断每种MRSA基因分类最可能的传播生态位,并描述MRSA与社会决定因素相关的空间流行病学。具体而言,我们旨在确定人口统计学和社会经济特征,这些特征在调整医院就诊数据后,能够解释HA-MRSA和CA-MRSA相对风险的跨区域额外变异。我们探讨了与2010年英国贫困指数(包括多重贫困指数以及几个贫困领域和子领域)、2011年英格兰和威尔士人口普查的人口统计学和社会经济指标(包括按贫困维度划分的家庭数量)以及人口健康指标之间关联的可能性。CA-MRSA和HA-MRSA均与家庭贫困相关(CA-MRSA相对风险[RR]:1.72[1.03 - 2.94];HA-MRSA RR:1.57[1.06 - 2.33]),这与医院就诊情况相关(皮尔逊相关系数[PCC] = 0.76)。HA-MRSA还与健康状况不佳(RR:1.10[1.01 - 1.19])和居住在公共养老院相关(RR:1.24[{1.12 - 1.37}]),而CA-MRSA与家庭过度拥挤(RR:1.58[1.04 - 2.41])以及更广泛的障碍相关,后者是家庭过度拥挤、低收入和无家可归的综合得分(RR:1.76[1.16 - 2.70])。CA-MRSA还与近期移民到英国相关(RR:1.77[1.19 - 2.66])。对于CA-MRSA相对风险的地区层面变异,28.67%可归因于目标地理区域的空间布局,而HA-MRSA仅为0.09%。本研究的一个优点是它提供了在服务区域接受护理的常住居民的代表性样本。一个局限性是,不能假定汇总数据分析中显示的关系在个体层面也成立。
没有证据表明HA-MRSA菌株存在社区传播,这意味着在社区中发现的HA-MRSA病例源自医院感染源,并通过频繁前往医疗机构而持续存在。相比之下,在与过度拥挤、无家可归、低收入和近期移民到英国相关的贫困地区,CA-MRSA风险较高,这无法用医疗保健接触来解释。此外,这些贫困地区附近的地区本身CA-MRSA风险更高,表明CA-MRSA存在社区传播。这种持续的社区传播可能导致CA-MRSA成为入院患者携带的主要菌株类型,特别是如果基于医院的成功MRSA感染控制计划得以维持。这些结果表明,需要针对CA-MRSA传播的社区感染控制计划,以控制社区和医院中的MRSA。这些流行病学变化也将对基于风险因素的医院入院MRSA筛查计划的有效性产生影响。