Suppr超能文献

在自由采食和限饲条件下,对两系选择提高饲料效率的兔子进行选择的直接和相关反应:I. 生产性状和肠道微生物群特征

Direct and correlated responses to selection in two lines of rabbits selected for feed efficiency under ad libitum and restricted feeding: I. Production traits and gut microbiota characteristics.

作者信息

Drouilhet L, Achard C S, Zemb O, Molette C, Gidenne T, Larzul C, Ruesche J, Tircazes A, Segura M, Bouchez T, Theau-Clément M, Joly T, Balmisse E, Garreau H, Gilbert H

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2016 Jan;94(1):38-48. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9402.

Abstract

To get insights into selection criteria for feed efficiency, 2 rabbit lines have been created: the ConsoResidual line was selected for residual feed intake (RFI) with ad libitum feeding and the ADGrestrict line was selected for ADG under restricted feeding (-20% of voluntary intake). The first objective of this study was to evaluate, after 9 generations of selection, the direct and correlated responses to selection on production traits in the 2 lines for traits recorded during growth. Second, applying the 2 feeding conditions used for selection to both selected lines plus the control unselected line (generation 0, G0) in a 2 × 3 factorial trial, the line performances were compared and the gut microbiota of the lines was characterized. The correlated responses in feed conversion ratio (FCR) were remarkably equivalent in both selected lines (-2.74 genetic σ) but correlated responses in other traits were notably different. In the ConsoResidual line, selection for decreased RFI resulted in a small negative correlated response in BW at 63 d old (BW63) and in a null response in ADG. In the ADGrestrict line, on the contrary, the correlated response in BW63 was substantial (+1.59 σ). The 2 selected lines had a FCR reduced by 0.2 point compared with the G0 line, and the same difference was found in both feeding regimens ( < 0.001). Indeed, selection on ADG would lead to heavier animals with no significant reduction of feed costs, whereas selection on RFI leads to lower feed costs and no increase of animal BW under ad libitum feeding. Altogether, our results do not suggest any genotype × environment interaction in the response to feeding regimens. The intestinal microbial communities from efficient rabbits differed from their unselected counterparts in terms of fermentation end products and microbial phylotypes, suggesting a central role of these microbes in the better feed efficiency of the rabbits.

摘要

为深入了解饲料效率的选择标准,已培育出2个兔品系:ConsoResidual品系通过自由采食条件下的剩余采食量(RFI)进行选择,ADGrestrict品系在限饲(-20%的自由采食量)条件下通过平均日增重(ADG)进行选择。本研究的首要目标是评估在9代选择后,这2个品系在生长期间记录的生产性状上对选择的直接和相关反应。其次,在一个2×3析因试验中,将用于选择的2种饲养条件应用于2个选择品系以及未选择的对照品系(第0代,G0),比较各品系的性能并对其肠道微生物群进行表征。两个选择品系的饲料转化率(FCR)相关反应显著相当(-2.74遗传标准差),但其他性状的相关反应明显不同。在ConsoResidual品系中,选择降低RFI导致63日龄体重(BW63)出现小的负相关反应,而ADG无反应。相反,在ADGrestrict品系中,BW63的相关反应显著(+1.59标准差)。与G0品系相比,2个选择品系的FCR均降低了0.2个单位,且两种饲养方案中的差异相同(<0.001)。实际上,选择ADG会使动物体重增加,但饲料成本无显著降低,而选择RFI会降低饲料成本,且在自由采食条件下动物体重不会增加。总体而言,我们的结果未表明在对饲养方案的反应中存在任何基因型×环境互作。高效兔的肠道微生物群落与其未选择的对应物在发酵终产物和微生物系统型方面存在差异,表明这些微生物在兔更好的饲料效率中发挥核心作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验