Choi Kyung Chul, Park Choon-Keun
Department of Neurosurgery, Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon, Korea.
Pain Physician. 2016 Feb;19(2):E301-8.
Percutaneous transforaminal techniques for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation have markedly evolved. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for L5-S1 disc herniation is regarded as challenging due to the unique anatomy of the iliac crest, large facet joint, and inclinatory disc space. Among these, the iliac crest is considered a major obstacle. There are no studies regarding the height of the iliac crest and their appropriate procedures in PELD.
This study discusses PELD for L5-S1 disc herniation and the appropriate approach according to the height of iliac crest.
Retrospective evaluation.
100 consecutive patients underwent PELD via the transforaminal route for L5-S1 disc herniation by a single surgeon. The study was divided into 2 groups: the foraminoplasty group requiring foraminal widening to access the herniated disc and the non-foraminoplasty group treated by conventional posterolateral access. Radiological parameters such as iliac height, the relative position of the iliac crest to the landmarks of the L5-S1 level, iliosacral angle and foraminal height, and disc location were considered. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0 - 10) for back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 0 - 100%), and the modified MacNab criteria.
The overall VAS scores for back and leg pain decreased from 6.0 to 2.3 and from 7.5 to 1.7. The mean ODI (%) improved from 54.0 to 11.6. Using modified MacNab criteria, a good outcome was 92%. Foraminoplasty was required in 19 patients. Iliac crest height was significantly higher in the foraminoplasty group than the non-foraminoplasty group (37.7 mm vs 30.1 mm, P < 0.001). In the foraminoplasty group, the iliac crest is above the mid L5 pedicle on lateral radiography in all cases. There were no significant differences in foraminal height, foraminal width, iliosacral angle, or disc height between the 2 groups. In addition, there were no differences in clinical outcome between the 2 groups.
This study is a retrospective analysis and simplifies the complexity of the L5-S1 level and iliac bone using two-dimensional radiography.
In high iliac crest cases where the iliac crest is above the mid L5 pedicle in lateral radiography, foraminoplasty may be considered for transforaminal access of L5-S1 disc herniation. Conventional transforaminal access can be utilized with ease in low iliac crest cases where the iliac crest is below the mid-L5 pedicle.
用于治疗腰椎间盘突出症的经皮椎间孔技术已经有了显著发展。由于髂嵴、大关节突和倾斜椎间盘间隙的独特解剖结构,经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)治疗L5 - S1椎间盘突出症被认为具有挑战性。其中,髂嵴被认为是主要障碍。目前尚无关于髂嵴高度及其在PELD中合适手术方法的研究。
本研究探讨PELD治疗L5 - S1椎间盘突出症以及根据髂嵴高度选择合适的手术入路。
回顾性评估。
由一名外科医生对100例连续的L5 - S1椎间盘突出症患者行经椎间孔途径的PELD手术。研究分为两组:需要扩大椎间孔以显露突出椎间盘的椎间孔扩大成形组和采用传统后外侧入路治疗的非椎间孔扩大成形组。考虑了诸如髂嵴高度、髂嵴相对于L5 - S1水平标志的相对位置、髂骶角和椎间孔高度以及椎间盘位置等放射学参数。通过视觉模拟评分法(VAS,0 - 10)评估腰腿痛情况,采用Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI,0 - 100%)和改良MacNab标准评估临床疗效。
腰腿痛的总体VAS评分分别从6.0降至2.3以及从7.5降至1.7。平均ODI(%)从54.0改善至11.6。采用改良MacNab标准,优良率为92%。19例患者需要进行椎间孔扩大成形术。椎间孔扩大成形组的髂嵴高度显著高于非椎间孔扩大成形组(37.7 mm对30.1 mm,P < 0.001)。在椎间孔扩大成形组中,所有病例在侧位X线片上髂嵴均高于L5椎弓根中部。两组之间在椎间孔高度、椎间孔宽度、髂骶角或椎间盘高度方面无显著差异。此外,两组之间的临床疗效也无差异。
本研究是一项回顾性分析,并且使用二维X线摄影简化了L5 - S1水平和髂骨的复杂性。
在侧位X线片上髂嵴高于L5椎弓根中部的高髂嵴病例中,对于L5 - S1椎间盘突出症的经椎间孔入路可考虑进行椎间孔扩大成形术。在髂嵴低于L5椎弓根中部下方的低髂嵴病例中可轻松采用传统的经椎间孔入路。