Suppr超能文献

酒精和咖啡因对冲突监测与适应的单独及联合效应。

Separate and joint effects of alcohol and caffeine on conflict monitoring and adaptation.

作者信息

Bailey Kira, Amlung Michael T, Morris David H, Price Mason H, Von Gunten Curtis, McCarthy Denis M, Bartholow Bruce D

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.

Midwest Alcoholism Research Center, Columbia, MO, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Apr;233(7):1245-55. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4208-y. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Caffeine is commonly believed to offset the acute effects of alcohol, but some evidence suggests that cognitive processes remain impaired when caffeine and alcohol are coadministered.

OBJECTIVES

No previous study has investigated the separate and joint effects of alcohol and caffeine on conflict monitoring and adaptation, processes thought to be critical for self-regulation. This was the purpose of the current study.

METHODS

Healthy, young adult social drinkers recruited from the community completed a flanker task after consuming one of four beverages in a 2 × 2 experimental design: Alcohol + caffeine, alcohol + placebo caffeine, placebo alcohol + caffeine, or placebo alcohol + placebo caffeine. Accuracy, response time, and the amplitude of the N2 component of the event-related potential (ERP), a neural index of conflict monitoring, were examined as a function of whether or not conflict was present (i.e., whether or not flankers were compatible with the target) on both the previous trial and the current trial.

RESULTS

Alcohol did not abolish conflict monitoring or adaptation. Caffeine eliminated conflict adaptation in sequential trials but also enhanced neural conflict monitoring. The combined effect of alcohol and caffeine was apparent only in how previous conflict affected the neural conflict monitoring response.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, the findings suggest that caffeine leads to exaggeration of attentional resource utilization, which could provide short-term benefits but lead to problems conserving resources for when they are most needed.

摘要

理论依据

人们普遍认为咖啡因可以抵消酒精的急性影响,但一些证据表明,同时摄入咖啡因和酒精时认知过程仍会受损。

目的

此前尚无研究调查酒精和咖啡因对冲突监测与适应的单独及联合影响,而冲突监测与适应被认为是自我调节的关键过程。本研究旨在探究此问题。

方法

从社区招募健康的年轻成年社交饮酒者,采用2×2实验设计,让他们在饮用四种饮料之一后完成一项侧翼任务:酒精+咖啡因、酒精+安慰剂咖啡因、安慰剂酒精+咖啡因或安慰剂酒精+安慰剂咖啡因。根据前一次试验和当前试验中是否存在冲突(即侧翼刺激与目标是否一致),检查准确性、反应时间以及事件相关电位(ERP)中N2成分的幅值(冲突监测的神经指标)。

结果

酒精并未消除冲突监测或适应。咖啡因消除了连续试验中的冲突适应,但也增强了神经冲突监测。酒精和咖啡因的联合效应仅在先前冲突如何影响神经冲突监测反应方面明显。

结论

这些研究结果共同表明,咖啡因会导致注意力资源利用过度,这可能带来短期益处,但在最需要资源时会导致资源保存问题。

相似文献

1
Separate and joint effects of alcohol and caffeine on conflict monitoring and adaptation.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Apr;233(7):1245-55. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4208-y. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
2
Female but not male young heavy drinkers display altered performance monitoring.
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Sep 30;233(3):424-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
4
Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory.
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):1953-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.023. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
5
Effects of repetition priming on electrophysiological and behavioral indices of conflict adaptation and cognitive control.
Psychophysiology. 2011 Dec;48(12):1621-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01265.x. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
6
Making sense of all the conflict: a theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Sep;93(3):283-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
7
Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2.
Psychophysiology. 2018 Feb;55(2). doi: 10.1111/psyp.12980. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
8
Effects of alcohol consumption and alcohol susceptibility on cognition: a psychophysiological examination.
Biol Psychol. 2003 Oct;64(1-2):167-90. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(03)00108-x.
9
Cognitive control in mild traumatic brain injury: conflict monitoring and conflict adaptation.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Oct;82(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.02.018. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
10
Performance monitoring following conflict: internal adjustments in cognitive control?
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Feb;50(3):426-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.021. Epub 2012 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Parsing the Neural Mechanisms of Short-Term and Long-Term Associations in the Flanker Tasks: An ERP Analysis.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug 5;15:626907. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.626907. eCollection 2021.
2
Alcohol and Neural Dynamics: A Meta-analysis of Acute Alcohol Effects on Event-Related Brain Potentials.
Biol Psychiatry. 2021 May 15;89(10):990-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.11.024. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
3
Modulation of compatibility effects in response to experience: Two tests of initial and sequential learning.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Feb;83(2):837-852. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02181-1. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
4
Temporal dynamics of reactive cognitive control as revealed by event-related brain potentials.
Psychophysiology. 2018 Mar;55(3). doi: 10.1111/psyp.13007. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The Gratton effect remains after controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions.
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 24;5:1207. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01207. eCollection 2014.
2
Caffeine Effects on ERP Components and Performance in an Equiprobable Auditory Go/NoGo Task.
J Caffeine Res. 2014 Sep 1;4(3):83-92. doi: 10.1089/jcr.2014.0011.
3
Making sense of all the conflict: a theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Sep;93(3):283-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
4
Frontal midline theta reflects anxiety and cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence.
J Physiol Paris. 2015 Feb-Jun;109(1-3):3-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
6
Context specificity of post-error and post-conflict cognitive control adjustments.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 6;9(3):e90281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090281. eCollection 2014.
7
8
The use of caffeinated alcoholic beverages among underage drinkers: results of a national survey.
Addict Behav. 2014 Jan;39(1):253-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
9
Conflicts as aversive signals: conflict priming increases negative judgments for neutral stimuli.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013 Jun;13(2):311-7. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0147-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验