Multivariate Behav Res. 1978 Jul 1;13(3):255-70. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1303_1.
The purposes of the research were: (1) to elicit spontaneously mentioned values from a large and diverse sample of respondents, (2) to compare the spontaneously mentioned values with Rokeach's terminal and instrumental values, (3) to determine the ways in which both sets of values were perceived as varying on selected independently measured properties, and (4) to provide structural representations of both value systems. The spontaneously mentioned values were interpretable in terms of the focus of concern (Self versus Society) and beliefs about how these concerns were to be achieved. The spontaneously mentioned values also revealed a simpler structure than Rokeach's values. The results are discussed in terms of the errors inherent in constraining respondents to a fixed response format and the implications for cross cultural research on the underlying structure of value systems.
(1)从大量不同的受访者中引出自发提到的价值观;(2)将自发提到的价值观与罗克奇的终极价值观和工具价值观进行比较;(3)确定这两套价值观在哪些方面被认为在选定的独立测量的属性上有所不同;(4)为这两个价值体系提供结构表示。自发提到的价值观可以根据关注的焦点(自我与社会)和关于如何实现这些关注点的信念来解释。自发提到的价值观也揭示了比罗克奇价值观更简单的结构。结果将从限制受访者使用固定的回答格式所固有的错误以及对跨文化价值观系统潜在结构研究的影响方面进行讨论。