Zamora-Legoff Jorge A, Krause Megan L, Crowson Cynthia S, Muskardin Theresa Wampler, Mason Thomas, Matteson Eric L
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Jun;35(6):1493-9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3190-4. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
A population-based cohort was utilized to evaluate medications and intra-articular injection utilization for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to inform clinical practice and further research. In a geographically defined population, all incident cases of JIA cases were identified between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2013 based first on diagnosis code followed by medical chart confirmation. Medications and intra-articular glucocorticoid injections were abstracted. Predictors of the first disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)/biologic and injections were reported as a hazard ratio (HR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for age and sex. Kaplan-Meier methods evaluated therapy at 6 months and 1 year. Injections were reported per 100 person-years (py) with 95 % CI using the Poisson methods. Seventy-one incident cases were identified. Forty-two (59 %) were female with mean age (standard deviation) at diagnosis of 8.2 (5.3) years. Twenty-six (37 %) utilized at least one DMARD or biologic, in which 77 % of these were prescribed in the first 6 months. Subtype of JIA was significantly associated with DMARDs/biologics (p < 0.001). Intra-articular injections were performed in 48 %. The rate of intra-articular injections was 20.7 per 100 py (95 % CI 16.5, 25.6). The rate of joint injections was higher in the first year after diagnosis (p < 0.001) and more common in recent years (p < 0.001). The majority of patients with JIA in a modern population-based cohort do not require DMARDs or biologics. In those who do, the majority receives these within the first 6 months. Intra-articular injections were utilized in almost half of patients with JIA and were increasingly used.
利用一个基于人群的队列来评估幼年特发性关节炎(JIA)患者的药物使用情况和关节内注射的使用情况,以为临床实践和进一步研究提供信息。在一个地理定义的人群中,1994年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间的所有JIA新发病例首先根据诊断编码进行识别,然后通过病历确认。提取药物和关节内糖皮质激素注射的相关信息。首次使用改善病情抗风湿药(DMARD)/生物制剂和注射的预测因素以风险比(HR)及95%置信区间(CI)表示,并根据年龄和性别进行了调整。采用Kaplan-Meier方法评估6个月和1年时的治疗情况。使用泊松方法报告每100人年(py)的注射次数及95%CI。共识别出71例新发病例。42例(59%)为女性,诊断时的平均年龄(标准差)为8.2(5.3)岁。26例(37%)使用了至少一种DMARD或生物制剂,其中77%在最初6个月内就开始使用。JIA的亚型与DMARDs/生物制剂的使用显著相关(p<0.001)。48%的患者接受了关节内注射。关节内注射率为每100 py 20.7次(95%CI 16.5,25.6)。诊断后第一年的关节注射率更高(p<0.001),且近年来更为常见(p<0.001)。在现代基于人群的队列中,大多数JIA患者不需要DMARDs或生物制剂。在需要的患者中,大多数在最初6个月内就开始使用这些药物。几乎一半的JIA患者使用了关节内注射,且使用频率越来越高。