Li Hao, Fan Ming-Qi, Men Tong-Yi, Wang Yun-Peng, Xing Tong-Hai, Fan Jun-Wei, Peng Zhi-Hai, Zhong Lin
Department of General Surgery, Shanghai First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Department of Urology Surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China (mainland).
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Feb 1;22:332-40. doi: 10.12659/MSM.895757.
The number and survival rate of simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (SLKT) recipients have increased dramatically since 2002. However, the long-term effectiveness of SLKT in patients with hepatitis B is unknown.
MATERIAL/METHODS: Forty-six patients who visited the Organ Transplant Center of the Shanghai First People's Hospital between January 2001 and May 2005 had hepatitis B virus infection and renal failure (any degree), and underwent organ transplantation: 21 patients underwent SLKT and 25 patients underwent liver transplant (LT) alone.
The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of SLKT recipients were 90.5%, 81.0%, and 81.0%, respectively. Incidence of acute hepatic allograft rejection between SLKT recipients and LT recipients (33% vs. 16%) did not reach significance (P=0.170). Despite higher infection rate, more prevalent hepatitis B relapse, and longer stay in the intensive care unit, SLKT recipients experienced significantly higher 1-year survival rate (90.5%) compared with LT recipients (60%, P=0.019). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that postoperative renal failure (odds ratio (OR)=48, P=0.003) and Risk/Injury/Failure/Loss/End-stage (RIFLE) stage (OR=8, P=0.012) were independent risk factors for postoperative death after LT.
SLKT in patients with hepatitis B had higher early-stage infection rate, but had a higher long-term survival rate compared with the LT group. Although the incidence of postoperative hepatitis B relapse in SLKT recipients was higher, timely and reasonable treatment can ensure long-term survival of patients. Worsening RIFLE stage of recipients can predict high mortality when only given LT. SLKT might be a better choice for RIFLE stage 2 or 3 patients than LT alone.
自2002年以来,肝肾联合移植(SLKT)受者的数量和生存率显著增加。然而,SLKT在乙型肝炎患者中的长期有效性尚不清楚。
材料/方法:2001年1月至2005年5月期间,46名就诊于上海第一人民医院器官移植中心的患者患有乙型肝炎病毒感染和肾衰竭(任何程度),并接受了器官移植:21名患者接受了SLKT,25名患者仅接受了肝移植(LT)。
SLKT受者的1年、3年和5年生存率分别为90.5%、81.0%和81.0%。SLKT受者与LT受者之间急性肝移植排斥反应的发生率(33%对16%)无显著差异(P=0.170)。尽管感染率较高、乙型肝炎复发更普遍且在重症监护病房停留时间更长,但SLKT受者的1年生存率(90.5%)显著高于LT受者(60%,P=0.019)。多因素回归分析显示,术后肾衰竭(比值比(OR)=48,P=0.003)和风险/损伤/衰竭/丢失/终末期(RIFLE)分期(OR=8,P=0.012)是LT术后死亡的独立危险因素。
乙型肝炎患者接受SLKT的早期感染率较高,但与LT组相比长期生存率更高。尽管SLKT受者术后乙型肝炎复发的发生率较高,但及时合理的治疗可确保患者的长期生存。受者RIFLE分期恶化可预测仅接受LT时的高死亡率。对于RIFLE 2期或3期患者,SLKT可能比单纯LT是更好的选择。