Sodano L, Radici F, Rossini A, D'Alessandro D
San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Department of Civil Building Environmental Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Ann Ig. 2015 Nov-Dec;27(6):814-23. doi: 10.7416/ai.2015.2075.
To carry out a pilot study aimed: a) to define and validate a method to evaluate Health Care Workers' (HCWs') knowledge about Ebola virus disease (EVD); b) to verify if the specific training on EVD followed in Emergency Units is associated to a significant difference in knowledge.
A cross-sectional study was carried out using an "ad hoc" questionnaire. It included 20 statements true/false, divided into three areas: risk of transmission (T); prevention and personal protection (PPP); environmental prevention (EP). The targets were the HCWs of Emergency Unit (trained) and Internal Medicine Units (control) of two hospitals in Rome (A and B). Internal consistency was evaluated using KR-20 coefficient. A proportion of 14/20 (70%) correct answers was considered acceptable. Mean scores and acceptable scores were compared using t-Student test and chi-squared test respectively. A logistic regression was fitted to identify independent factors associated with acceptable knowledge level for the whole questionnaire and each area.
237 HCWs were included in the pilot study, with a participation percentage of 89.1%. The reliability coefficient (KR-20) was 0.6 for the entire 20-item questionnaire. Overall proportion of respondents with acceptable score was 32.9%; the highest proportion (61.1%) was found in trained HCWs (p<0.02). Factors associated with an acceptable knowledge were: belonging to hospital A (p<0.001) and having been trained on EVD (p=0.03). Stratifying by area, the variables significantly related to an acceptable score were: for PPP area younger HCWs (p<0.01) and nurses (p<0.01); for EP area, belonging to hospital A (p<0.01) and to Internal Medicine Unit (p=0.02).
The high compliance and completeness of the responses indicate the validity of the method of administration adopted. In the investigated hospitals the specific training on EVD determined a significant overall improvement in knowledge. It will be appropriate to extend the study to other hospitals around the Country to evaluate the true effectiveness of the training in a larger sample of hospitals.
开展一项试点研究,旨在:a)定义并验证一种评估医护人员(HCWs)对埃博拉病毒病(EVD)知识的方法;b)核实急诊科针对EVD开展的特定培训是否与知识水平的显著差异相关。
采用一份“特制”问卷进行横断面研究。问卷包含20条是非题,分为三个领域:传播风险(T);预防与个人防护(PPP);环境预防(EP)。研究对象是罗马两家医院(A和B)急诊科(接受培训)和内科病房(对照组)的医护人员。使用KR - 20系数评估内部一致性。14/20(70%)的正确答案比例被视为可接受。分别使用t检验和卡方检验比较平均得分和可接受得分。进行逻辑回归分析以确定与整个问卷及每个领域可接受知识水平相关的独立因素。
237名医护人员纳入试点研究,参与率为89.1%。整个20项问卷的信度系数(KR - 20)为0.6。得分可接受的受访者总体比例为32.9%;接受培训的医护人员中这一比例最高(61.1%)(p<0.02)。与可接受知识相关的因素有:隶属于医院A(p<0.001)以及接受过EVD培训(p = 0.03)。按领域分层,与可接受得分显著相关的变量为:在PPP领域,年轻医护人员(p<0.01)和护士(p<0.01);在EP领域,隶属于医院A(p<0.01)和内科病房(p = 0.02)。
回复的高依从性和完整性表明所采用的管理方法有效。在所调查的医院中,针对EVD的特定培训使知识水平总体有显著提高。将该研究扩展至全国其他医院以在更大的医院样本中评估培训的实际效果是合适的。