McLean R C, Morrison D S, Shearer R, Boyle S, Logue J
Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
West of Scotland Cancer Surveillance Unit, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, UK.
Clin Obes. 2016 Apr;6(2):133-42. doi: 10.1111/cob.12136. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
The objective of the study is to investigate the effect of baseline anxiety and depression, using different definitions for caseness, on attrition and weight outcomes following a multidisciplinary weight management programme. The study design is a prospective observational study. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to measure anxiety and depression with 'caseness' scoring ≥11 and severity ≥14. The participants were all patients who began a weight management programme between 1 October 2008 and 30 September 2009 (n = 1838). The setting was the Glasgow and Clyde Weight Management Service (GCWMS), a specialist multidisciplinary service, which aims to achieve a minimum of ≥5 kg weight loss. The results were as follows: patients with HADS score ≥14 were referred to the integrated psychology service for psychological assessment or intervention. Patients with caseness (HADS ≥11) for anxiety (33%) and depression (27%) were significantly younger, heavier, more socio-economically deprived and a higher proportion was female. There was a significant positive correlation between HADS anxiety and depression scores and increasing body mass index (r(2) = 0.094, P < 0.001 and r(2) = 0.175, P < 0.001, respectively). Attendance and completion was lower throughout follow-up amongst patients with anxiety or depression. More patients with HADS score ≥11 achieved ≥5 kg or ≥5% weight loss and by 12 months those with anxiety had a significantly higher mean weight loss (P = 0.032). Participants who scored for severe anxiety (HADS ≥14) achieved similar weight loss to those without, whilst participants who scored for severe depression achieved significantly greater weight loss than non-cases at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up (P < 0.01). Despite a less favourable case-mix of risk-factors for poor weight loss, patients who scored caseness for severe anxiety or depression and were offered additional psychological input achieved similar or better weight loss outcomes.
本研究的目的是调查使用不同病例定义的基线焦虑和抑郁对多学科体重管理计划后的失访情况和体重结果的影响。研究设计为前瞻性观察性研究。使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)以“病例”评分≥11且严重程度≥14来测量焦虑和抑郁。参与者为2008年10月1日至2009年9月30日期间开始体重管理计划的所有患者(n = 1838)。研究地点是格拉斯哥和克莱德体重管理服务中心(GCWMS),这是一项专业的多学科服务,旨在实现至少≥5千克的体重减轻。结果如下:HADS评分≥14的患者被转介至综合心理服务部门进行心理评估或干预。焦虑(33%)和抑郁(27%)“病例”(HADS≥11)的患者明显更年轻、体重更重、社会经济剥夺程度更高,且女性比例更高。HADS焦虑和抑郁评分与体重指数增加之间存在显著正相关(分别为r² = 0.094,P < 0.001和r² = 0.175,P < 0.001)。在随访期间,焦虑或抑郁患者的就诊率和完成率较低。HADS评分≥11的更多患者实现了≥5千克或≥5%的体重减轻,到12个月时,焦虑患者的平均体重减轻明显更高(P = 0.032)。重度焦虑(HADS≥14)评分的参与者与无重度焦虑评分的参与者体重减轻情况相似,而重度抑郁评分的参与者在随访3个月、6个月和12个月时比非病例参与者体重减轻明显更多(P < 0.01)。尽管存在不利于体重减轻的风险因素组合情况,但重度焦虑或抑郁“病例”评分且接受额外心理干预的患者体重减轻结果相似或更好。