Agrawal Swastik, Dhiman Radha K, Limdi Jimmy K
Department of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Gastroenterology, The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK Honorary Senior Lecturer- Institute of Inflammation and Repair, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Postgrad Med J. 2016 Apr;92(1086):223-34. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133715. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
Incidentally detected abnormality in liver function tests is a common situation encountered by physicians across all disciplines. Many of these patients do not have primary liver disease as most of the commonly performed markers are not specific for the liver and are affected by myriad factors unrelated to liver disease. Also, many of these tests like liver enzyme levels do not measure the function of the liver, but are markers of liver injury, which is broadly of two types: hepatocellular and cholestatic. A combination of a careful history and clinical examination along with interpretation of pattern of liver test abnormalities can often identify type and aetiology of liver disease, allowing for a targeted investigation approach. Severity of liver injury is best assessed by composite scores like the Model for End Stage Liver Disease rather than any single parameter. In this review, we discuss the interpretation of the routinely performed liver tests along with the indications and utility of quantitative tests.
肝功能检查中偶然发现的异常是所有学科医生都会遇到的常见情况。这些患者中许多人没有原发性肝病,因为大多数常用指标并非肝脏特异性的,且受众多与肝病无关的因素影响。此外,许多这类检查,如肝酶水平,并非测量肝脏功能,而是肝损伤的标志物,肝损伤大致分为两种类型:肝细胞性和胆汁淤积性。仔细的病史采集、临床检查以及对肝功能检查异常模式的解读相结合,通常能够确定肝病的类型和病因,从而采取有针对性的检查方法。肝损伤的严重程度最好通过诸如终末期肝病模型等综合评分来评估,而非任何单一参数。在本综述中,我们讨论常规肝功能检查的解读以及定量检查的适应证和用途。