Suppr超能文献

生前预嘱:伦理困境。

Living wills: the ethical dilemmas.

作者信息

Ney C A

出版信息

Crit Care Nurse. 1989 Sep;9(8):20-1, 24-5, 28-40.

PMID:2684546
Abstract

Advanced technology has created various means to prolong life, along with the supposed obligation to use those technologies. Often costly, these technologies may have little or no impact on the outcomes of illness. When and how that technology should be used may result in conflict. By writing a living will, some persons have said "Thanks, but no thanks" to the use of these technologies. Many healthcare professionals, however, are reluctant, because of misinformation or fear of litigation, to respect consumers' rejection of the offer of prolonged life at all costs. An examination of the legal, ethical and emotional aspects of NDAs and living wills may provide some guidelines for dealing with the conflicts encountered in practice. In addition, an awareness of personal feelings may clarify some of the gray areas involved in living wills and assist healthcare professionals to make decisions about Natural Death Acts.

摘要

先进技术创造了各种延长生命的手段,同时也带来了使用这些技术的所谓义务。这些技术往往成本高昂,对疾病的治疗结果可能影响甚微或毫无影响。何时以及如何使用这些技术可能会引发冲突。通过签署生前预嘱,一些人对使用这些技术表示“谢谢,但不用了”。然而,许多医疗保健专业人员由于错误信息或担心诉讼,不愿尊重消费者不惜一切代价拒绝延长生命提议的决定。审视生前预嘱和自然死亡声明的法律、伦理和情感方面,可能会为处理实践中遇到的冲突提供一些指导方针。此外,了解个人感受可能会澄清生前预嘱中涉及的一些灰色地带,并帮助医疗保健专业人员就自然死亡法案做出决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验