• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用下一代测序数据进行结构变异检测:一项比较技术综述。

Structural variation detection using next-generation sequencing data: A comparative technical review.

作者信息

Guan Peiyong, Sung Wing-Kin

机构信息

School of Computing, National University of Singapore, 117543, Singapore.

School of Computing, National University of Singapore, 117543, Singapore; Computational & Mathematical Biology Group, Genome Institute of Singapore, 138672, Singapore.

出版信息

Methods. 2016 Jun 1;102:36-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.01.020
PMID:26845461
Abstract

Structural variations (SVs) are mutations in the genome of size at least fifty nucleotides. They contribute to the phenotypic differences among healthy individuals, cause severe diseases and even cancers by breaking or linking genes. Thus, it is crucial to systematically profile SVs in the genome. In the past decade, many next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based SV detection methods have been proposed due to the significant cost reduction of NGS experiments and their ability to unbiasedly detect SVs to the base-pair resolution. These SV detection methods vary in both sensitivity and specificity, since they use different SV-property-dependent and library-property-dependent features. As a result, predictions from different SV callers are often inconsistent. Besides, the noises in the data (both platform-specific sequencing error and artificial chimeric reads) impede the specificity of SV detection. Poorly characterized regions in the human genome (e.g., repeat regions) greatly impact the reads mapping and in turn affect the SV calling accuracy. Calling of complex SVs requires specialized SV callers. Apart from accuracy, processing speed of SV caller is another factor deciding its usability. Knowing the pros and cons of different SV calling techniques and the objectives of the biological study are essential for biologists and bioinformaticians to make informed decisions. This paper describes different components in the SV calling pipeline and reviews the techniques used by existing SV callers. Through simulation study, we also demonstrate that library properties, especially insert size, greatly impact the sensitivity of different SV callers. We hope the community can benefit from this work both in designing new SV calling methods and in selecting the appropriate SV caller for specific biological studies.

摘要

结构变异(SVs)是基因组中长度至少为五十个核苷酸的突变。它们导致健康个体之间的表型差异,通过破坏或连接基因引发严重疾病甚至癌症。因此,系统地描绘基因组中的结构变异至关重要。在过去十年中,由于下一代测序(NGS)实验成本大幅降低且能够以碱基对分辨率无偏地检测结构变异,许多基于NGS的结构变异检测方法被提出。这些结构变异检测方法在灵敏度和特异性方面各不相同,因为它们使用了不同的依赖于结构变异特性和文库特性的特征。结果,不同结构变异检测程序的预测结果往往不一致。此外,数据中的噪声(包括平台特异性测序错误和人工嵌合读段)妨碍了结构变异检测的特异性。人类基因组中特征描述不佳的区域(例如重复区域)极大地影响读段映射,进而影响结构变异的调用准确性。复杂结构变异的调用需要专门的结构变异检测程序。除了准确性之外,结构变异检测程序的处理速度是决定其可用性的另一个因素。了解不同结构变异调用技术的优缺点以及生物学研究的目标,对于生物学家和生物信息学家做出明智的决策至关重要。本文描述了结构变异调用流程中的不同组件,并回顾了现有结构变异检测程序所使用的技术。通过模拟研究,我们还证明文库特性,尤其是插入片段大小,对不同结构变异检测程序的灵敏度有很大影响。我们希望该领域能从这项工作中受益,无论是在设计新的结构变异调用方法还是为特定生物学研究选择合适的结构变异检测程序方面。

相似文献

1
Structural variation detection using next-generation sequencing data: A comparative technical review.利用下一代测序数据进行结构变异检测:一项比较技术综述。
Methods. 2016 Jun 1;102:36-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
2
Comprehensive evaluation and guidance of structural variation detection tools in chicken whole genome sequence data.鸡全基因组序列数据中结构变异检测工具的综合评估和指导
BMC Genomics. 2024 Oct 16;25(1):970. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10875-1.
3
Benchmarking long-read aligners and SV callers for structural variation detection in Oxford nanopore sequencing data.基于 Oxford nanopore 测序数据的结构变异检测的长读长比对软件和变异调用软件的基准测试。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 14;14(1):6160. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56604-2.
4
Structural variation discovery in the cancer genome using next generation sequencing: computational solutions and perspectives.利用下一代测序技术在癌症基因组中发现结构变异:计算解决方案与展望。
Oncotarget. 2015 Mar 20;6(8):5477-89. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3491.
5
Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection algorithms for whole genome sequencing.全基因组测序结构变异检测算法的综合评估。
Genome Biol. 2019 Jun 3;20(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1720-5.
6
Comparison of structural variant callers for massive whole-genome sequence data.大规模全基因组序列数据结构变异调用器的比较。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Mar 28;25(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10239-9.
7
VISTA: an integrated framework for structural variant discovery.VISTA:一个用于结构变异发现的集成框架。
Brief Bioinform. 2024 Jul 25;25(5). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae462.
8
Comparison of multiple algorithms to reliably detect structural variants in pears.比较多种算法以可靠地检测梨中的结构变异。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 20;21(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6455-x.
9
The impact of FASTQ and alignment read order on structural variant calling from long-read sequencing data.FASTQ 和比对读序对长读测序数据结构变异调用的影响。
PeerJ. 2024 Mar 15;12:e17101. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17101. eCollection 2024.
10
Evaluating nanopore sequencing data processing pipelines for structural variation identification.评估纳米孔测序数据处理管道进行结构变异识别。
Genome Biol. 2019 Nov 14;20(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1858-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Benchmarking long-read structural variant calling tools and combinations for detecting somatic variants in cancer genomes.评估用于检测癌症基因组中体细胞变异的长读长结构变异检测工具及组合。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 13;15(1):8707. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92750-x.
2
Comparisons of performances of structural variants detection algorithms in solitary or combination strategy.结构变异检测算法在单独或联合策略下的性能比较。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 6;20(2):e0314982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314982. eCollection 2025.
3
A copy number variation detection method based on OCSVM algorithm using multi strategies integration.
一种基于多策略集成的支持向量数据描述(OCSVM)算法的拷贝数变异检测方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):3526. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88143-9.
4
Replication stress increases de novo CNVs across the malaria parasite genome.复制应激增加了疟原虫基因组中的新生拷贝数变异。
bioRxiv. 2024 Dec 31:2024.12.19.629492. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.19.629492.
5
Comprehensive evaluation and guidance of structural variation detection tools in chicken whole genome sequence data.鸡全基因组序列数据中结构变异检测工具的综合评估和指导
BMC Genomics. 2024 Oct 16;25(1):970. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10875-1.
6
Detection and analysis of complex structural variation in human genomes across populations and in brains of donors with psychiatric disorders.检测和分析人类基因组在不同人群和精神疾病供体大脑中的复杂结构变异。
Cell. 2024 Nov 14;187(23):6687-6706.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.014. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
7
VolcanoSV enables accurate and robust structural variant calling in diploid genomes from single-molecule long read sequencing.VolcanoSV 可实现基于单分子长读测序的二倍体基因组中准确稳健的结构变异 calling。
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 13;15(1):6956. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51282-0.
8
Unveiling the Influence of Copy Number Variations on Genetic Diversity and Adaptive Evolution in China's Native Pig Breeds via Whole-Genome Resequencing.通过全基因组重测序揭示中国本土猪种的拷贝数变异对遗传多样性和适应性进化的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 27;25(11):5843. doi: 10.3390/ijms25115843.
9
Detection of Novel BEST1 Variations in Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy Using Third-generation Sequencing.利用第三代测序技术检测常染色体隐性 Bestrophinopathy 中的新型 BEST1 变异。
Curr Med Sci. 2024 Apr;44(2):419-425. doi: 10.1007/s11596-024-2865-3. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
10
The impact of FASTQ and alignment read order on structural variant calling from long-read sequencing data.FASTQ 和比对读序对长读测序数据结构变异调用的影响。
PeerJ. 2024 Mar 15;12:e17101. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17101. eCollection 2024.