Suppr超能文献

口腔生物膜中存在的有机酸对树脂复合材料修复粘结强度的耐久性、吸附性和溶解性的影响。

Influence of organic acids present in oral biofilm on the durability of the repair bond strength, sorption and solubility of resin composites.

作者信息

Da Silva Stephane, Da Silva Eduardo Moreira, Delphim Marcella Bruna Ferreira, Poskus Laiza Tatiana, Amaral Cristiane Mariote

出版信息

Am J Dent. 2015 Dec;28(6):367-72.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the repair bond strength after storage in water, lactic and propionic acid after 7 days and 6 months and the sorption and solubility of resin composites used.

METHODS

Five cylinders of each resin composite (microhybrid, nanofilled and silorane-based composite) were prepared. Specimens were aged with thermocycling (5 and 55°C) 5,000 times. A repair procedure was performed using intraoral sandblasting with 50-µm aluminum oxide, application of an adhesive system and cylinder of composite was fabricated. Specimens were sectioned into beams and stored in three immersion media: water, propionic acid and lactic acid. The microtensile bond strength was measured after periods of 7 days and 6 months. Sorption and solubility were evaluated using 15 specimens (0 = 6 mm; h = 1 mm) of each resin composite, which were prepared and assigned into three groups (n = 5) according to the immersion media (water, propionic acid and lactic acid). Data were analyzed using one-way/two-way/three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The resin composites, immersion media and time of immersion did not affect the repair bond strength (microhybrid 38.3 to 40.9 MPa; nanofilled 38.7 to 42.2 MPa; silorane 41.2 to 51.1 MPa). Additionally, the immersion media did not affect the sorption and solubility. The silorane-based composite presented the lowest sorption (10.5 to 12.1 µg/mm3) and solubility (-2.4 to -2.7 µg/mm3), while the nanofilled methacrylate-based composite showed the highest sorption (32.1 to 33.6 µg/mm3). Regarding solubility, the nanofilled and microhybrid methacrylate-based composites did not present statistically significant differences.

摘要

目的

评估在水、乳酸和丙酸中储存7天及6个月后的修复粘结强度,以及所用树脂复合材料的吸附性和溶解性。

方法

制备每种树脂复合材料(微混合、纳米填充和硅氧烷基复合材料)的五个圆柱体。样本经5000次热循环(5和55°C)老化。采用50μm氧化铝进行口内喷砂、应用粘结系统并制作复合材料圆柱体进行修复操作。将样本切成梁状并储存在三种浸泡介质中:水、丙酸和乳酸。在7天和6个月后测量微拉伸粘结强度。使用每种树脂复合材料的15个样本(直径 = 6 mm;高度 = 1 mm)评估吸附性和溶解性,这些样本根据浸泡介质(水、丙酸和乳酸)制备并分为三组(n = 5)。数据采用单向/双向/三向方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)进行分析。

结果

树脂复合材料、浸泡介质和浸泡时间均不影响修复粘结强度(微混合复合材料为38.3至40.9 MPa;纳米填充复合材料为38.7至42.2 MPa;硅氧烷复合材料为41.2至51.1 MPa)。此外,浸泡介质不影响吸附性和溶解性。硅氧烷基复合材料的吸附性最低(10.5至12.1 μg/mm³),溶解性最低(-2.4至-2.7 μg/mm³),而纳米填充甲基丙烯酸酯基复合材料的吸附性最高(32.1至33.6 μg/mm³)。关于溶解性,纳米填充和微混合甲基丙烯酸酯基复合材料无统计学显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验