Pouw B, Hellingman D, Kieft M, Vogel W V, van Os K J, Rutgers E J T, Valdés Olmos R A, Stokkel M P M
Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;42(4):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.009. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
Lymphoscintigraphy with planar imaging is considered a helpful tool to depict lymph node drainage in patients with invasive breast cancer. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography with integrated CT (SPECT/CT) is usually performed to detect sentinel nodes (SN)s in breast cancer patients showing non-visualisation on lymphoscintigraphy. Incorporation of new SN indications (recurrent surgery, previous radiotherapy, or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy) has led to an increase of non-visualisation rates. The present study evaluates the contribution of SPECT/CT and tracer reinjection for SN-visualisation in breast cancer patients without drainage on lymphoscintigraphy.
Between 1st of July 2008 and 6th of November 2014 in total 1968 patients underwent a SN breast procedure, using intra-tumoural tracer administration. SPECT/CT was performed in 284 breast cancer patients with non-visualisation of SNs on lymphoscintigraphy. If SN non-visualisation persisted, a second radiotracer injection with repeated imaging was performed when logistics allowed this. Univariate analysis was applied to evaluate SPECT/CT visualisation rates in specific subgroups.
The SPECT/CT visualisation rate was 23.2% (66/284). Univariate analysis revealed no significant subgroups influencing SPECT/CT visualisation. In patients receiving reinjection after persistent SPECT/CT non-visualisation the SN-visualisation rate reached 62.1% (36/58). Intraoperatively, the SN-identification rate using a gamma probe and blue dye was 87.9% (175/199) and 32.9% (28/85) for, respectively, primary and recurrent surgery after non-visualisation on lymphoscintigraphy.
In this evaluation including new breast cancer SN indications, SPECT/CT scored lower than reinjection to visualise SNs in patients with non-visualisation on lymphoscintigraphy. Consequently, our institutional protocol has been readjusted.
平面成像淋巴闪烁造影被认为是描绘浸润性乳腺癌患者淋巴结引流的有用工具。对于在淋巴闪烁造影中未显影的乳腺癌患者,通常会进行单光子发射计算机断层扫描与计算机断层扫描(SPECT/CT)以检测前哨淋巴结(SN)。新的SN适应症(再次手术、既往放疗或新辅助化疗)的纳入导致未显影率增加。本研究评估了SPECT/CT和示踪剂再注射对淋巴闪烁造影无引流的乳腺癌患者SN显影的作用。
2008年7月1日至2014年11月6日期间,共有1968例患者接受了SN乳腺手术,采用瘤内注射示踪剂。284例淋巴闪烁造影中SN未显影的乳腺癌患者接受了SPECT/CT检查。如果SN仍未显影,在条件允许时进行第二次放射性示踪剂注射并重复成像。采用单因素分析评估特定亚组中的SPECT/CT显影率。
SPECT/CT显影率为23.2%(66/284)。单因素分析显示,没有显著的亚组影响SPECT/CT显影。在SPECT/CT持续未显影后接受再注射的患者中,SN显影率达到62.1%(36/58)。术中,在淋巴闪烁造影未显影后,初次手术和再次手术使用γ探针和蓝色染料的SN识别率分别为87.9%(175/199)和32.9%(28/85)。
在这项包括新的乳腺癌SN适应症的评估中,对于淋巴闪烁造影未显影的患者,SPECT/CT在SN显影方面的得分低于再注射。因此,我们机构的方案已进行了调整。