Friederichs Stijn A H, Oenema Anke, Bolman Catherine, Lechner Lilian
a Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences , Open University of the Netherlands , Heerlen , The Netherlands.
b Department of Health Promotion , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Psychol Health. 2016 Aug;31(8):907-30. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2016.1151018. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
This study explores whether a web-based physical activity (PA) intervention grounded in self-determination theory (SDT) and motivational interviewing (MI) is more effective and better appreciated than a traditional web-based PA intervention.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted, comparing (1) I Move; a web-based PA intervention based on SDT and MI, (2) Active Plus; a traditional web-based PA intervention and (3) a waiting list control condition.
Weekly minutes of moderate to vigorous PA and weekly days with ≥30 min PA were measured through self-report at baseline and at 3 and 6 months from baseline.
I Move achieved a small, but significant increase in weekly minutes of moderate to vigorous PA, while Active Plus did not have a significant impact on this outcome. Both interventions were effective in increasing weekly days with ≥30 min PA, whereas Active Plus yielded a greater effect on this outcome.
Overall, the web-based PA intervention grounded in SDT and MI did not outperform the traditional web-based PA intervention. Further research should reveal whether this type of intervention is profitable for long-term maintenance of PA levels.
本研究探讨基于自我决定理论(SDT)和动机性访谈(MI)的网络体育活动(PA)干预是否比传统的网络PA干预更有效且更受欢迎。
进行了一项随机对照试验,比较(1)“我行动”;一种基于SDT和MI的网络PA干预,(2)“活力加”;一种传统的网络PA干预,以及(3)一个等待列表对照条件。
通过在基线时以及基线后3个月和6个月时的自我报告,测量每周中等至剧烈PA的分钟数以及每周进行≥30分钟PA的天数。
“我行动”使每周中等至剧烈PA的分钟数有小幅但显著的增加,而“活力加”对这一结果没有显著影响。两种干预措施在增加每周进行≥30分钟PA的天数方面均有效,而“活力加”对这一结果的影响更大。
总体而言,基于SDT和MI的网络PA干预并未优于传统的网络PA干预。进一步的研究应揭示这种类型的干预对于长期维持PA水平是否有益。