Suppr超能文献

罗替戈汀治疗血液透析相关性不安腿综合征的随机对照试验。

Rotigotine in Hemodialysis-Associated Restless Legs Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Sleep Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, Gui-de-Chauliac Hospital, CHU Montpellier, INSERM U1061, Montpellier, France.

Somni Bene Institut für Medizinische Forschung und Schlafmedizin, Schwerin, Germany; Rostock University, Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Sep;68(3):434-43. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.12.027. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) has been associated with insomnia, decreased quality of life, and increased morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease. This randomized controlled trial investigated effects of rotigotine in patients with RLS and end-stage renal disease.

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blind placebo-controlled study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adults with moderate to severe RLS (International RLS Study Group Rating Scale [IRLS] ≥ 15) and Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI) ≥ 15 who were receiving thrice-weekly hemodialysis enrolled from sites in the United States and Europe.

INTERVENTION

Following randomization and titration (≤21 + 3 days) to optimal-dose rotigotine (1-3mg/24 h) or placebo, patients entered a 2-week maintenance period. Polysomnography was performed at baseline and the end of maintenance.

OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Primary efficacy outcome: reduction in PLMI, assessed by ratio of PLMI at end of maintenance to baseline. Secondary/other outcomes (P values exploratory) included mean changes from baseline in PLMI, IRLS, and Clinical Global Impression item 1 (CGI-1 [severity of illness]) score.

RESULTS

30 patients were randomly assigned (rotigotine, 20; placebo, 10); 25 (15; 10) completed the study with evaluable data. Mean (SD) PLMI ratio (end of maintenance to baseline) was 0.7±0.4 for rotigotine and 1.3±0.7 for placebo (analysis of covariance treatment ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.88; P=0.02). Numerical improvements were observed with rotigotine versus placebo in IRLS and CGI-1 (least squares mean treatment differences of -6.08 [95% CI, -12.18 to 0.02; P=0.05] and -0.81 [95% CI, -1.94 to 0.33; P=0.2]). 10 of 15 rotigotine and 2 of 10 placebo patients were CGI-1 responders (≥50% improvement). Hemodialysis did not affect unconjugated rotigotine concentrations. The most common adverse events (≥2 patients) were nausea (rotigotine, 4 [20%]; placebo, 0); vomiting (3 [15%]; 0); diarrhea (1 [5%]; 2 [20%]); headache (2 [10%]; 0); dyspnea (2 [10%]; 0); and hypertension (2 [10%]; 0).

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and short duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Rotigotine improved periodic limb movements and RLS symptoms in the short term among ESRD patients requiring hemodialysis in a small-scale study. No dose adjustments are necessary for hemodialysis patients.

摘要

背景

不宁腿综合征(RLS)与终末期肾病患者的失眠、生活质量下降以及发病率和死亡率增加有关。本随机对照试验研究了罗替高汀在 RLS 和终末期肾病患者中的作用。

研究设计

双盲安慰剂对照研究。

地点和参与者

来自美国和欧洲多个地点的中度至重度 RLS(国际 RLS 研究组评定量表[IRLS]≥15)和周期性肢体运动指数(PLMI)≥15的接受每周三次血液透析的成年人参与了这项研究。

干预措施

在随机分组和滴定(≤21+3 天)至最佳剂量罗替高汀(1-3mg/24 h)或安慰剂后,患者进入为期 2 周的维持期。在基线和维持期末进行多导睡眠图检查。

结果

30 名患者被随机分配(罗替高汀,20 名;安慰剂,10 名);25 名(15 名;10 名)患者完成了研究并具有可评估的数据。罗替高汀的平均(SD)PLMI 比值(维持期末与基线相比)为 0.7±0.4,安慰剂为 1.3±0.7(协方差分析治疗比值,0.44;95%CI,0.22 至 0.88;P=0.02)。与安慰剂相比,罗替高汀在 IRLS 和 CGI-1 方面观察到数值上的改善(最小二乘均数治疗差异-6.08[95%CI,-12.18 至 0.02;P=0.05]和-0.81[95%CI,-1.94 至 0.33;P=0.2])。15 名罗替高汀患者中有 10 名和 10 名安慰剂患者中有 2 名达到 CGI-1 应答(≥50%改善)。血液透析不影响未结合的罗替高汀浓度。最常见的不良事件(≥2 名患者)为恶心(罗替高汀,4[20%];安慰剂,0);呕吐(3[15%];0);腹泻(1[5%];2[20%]);头痛(2[10%];0);呼吸困难(2[10%];0);高血压(2[10%];0)。

局限性

样本量小,持续时间短。

结论

在一项小规模研究中,罗替高汀在需要血液透析的终末期肾病患者中短期改善了周期性肢体运动和 RLS 症状。血液透析患者无需调整剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验