U.S. Geological Survey, California Water Science Center, Placer Hall, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819, USA.
U.S. Geological Survey, Oregon Water Science Center, 2130 SW 5(th) Avenue, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Apr 15;550:835-850. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.081. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
Sediment-toxicity benchmarks are needed to interpret the biological significance of currently used pesticides detected in whole sediments. Two types of freshwater sediment benchmarks for pesticides were developed using spiked-sediment bioassay (SSB) data from the literature. These benchmarks can be used to interpret sediment-toxicity data or to assess the potential toxicity of pesticides in whole sediment. The Likely Effect Benchmark (LEB) defines a pesticide concentration in whole sediment above which there is a high probability of adverse effects on benthic invertebrates, and the Threshold Effect Benchmark (TEB) defines a concentration below which adverse effects are unlikely. For compounds without available SSBs, benchmarks were estimated using equilibrium partitioning (EqP). When a sediment sample contains a pesticide mixture, benchmark quotients can be summed for all detected pesticides to produce an indicator of potential toxicity for that mixture. Benchmarks were developed for 48 pesticide compounds using SSB data and 81 compounds using the EqP approach. In an example application, data for pesticides measured in sediment from 197 streams across the United States were evaluated using these benchmarks, and compared to measured toxicity from whole-sediment toxicity tests conducted with the amphipod Hyalella azteca (28-d exposures) and the midge Chironomus dilutus (10-d exposures). Amphipod survival, weight, and biomass were significantly and inversely related to summed benchmark quotients, whereas midge survival, weight, and biomass showed no relationship to benchmarks. Samples with LEB exceedances were rare (n=3), but all were toxic to amphipods (i.e., significantly different from control). Significant toxicity to amphipods was observed for 72% of samples exceeding one or more TEBs, compared to 18% of samples below all TEBs. Factors affecting toxicity below TEBs may include the presence of contaminants other than pesticides, physical/chemical characteristics of sediment, and uncertainty in TEB values. Additional evaluations of benchmarks in relation to sediment chemistry and toxicity are ongoing.
需要沉积物毒性基准来解释目前在整个沉积物中检测到的已用农药的生物学意义。使用文献中 spike-sediment bioassay (SSB) 的数据开发了两种类型的淡水沉积物农药基准。这些基准可用于解释沉积物毒性数据或评估整个沉积物中农药的潜在毒性。可能效应基准(LEB)定义了整个沉积物中农药浓度,高于此浓度,底栖无脊椎动物受到不利影响的可能性很高,而阈值效应基准(TEB)则定义了低于此浓度,不利影响不太可能发生的浓度。对于没有可用 SSB 的化合物,使用平衡分配(EqP)估算基准。当沉积物样品中含有农药混合物时,可以对所有检测到的农药的基准商进行求和,以产生该混合物潜在毒性的指标。使用 SSB 数据为 48 种农药化合物和 EqP 方法为 81 种化合物开发了基准。在一个应用示例中,使用这些基准评估了在美国 197 条溪流沉积物中测量的农药数据,并将其与使用淡水蚤(Hyalella azteca)(28 天暴露)和摇蚊(Chironomus dilutus)(10 天暴露)进行的整个沉积物毒性测试测量的毒性进行了比较。在所有基准中,与水蚤的生存、体重和生物量呈显著负相关,而摇蚊的生存、体重和生物量与基准没有关系。LEB 超标样本很少(n=3),但所有样本对水蚤均有毒(即与对照显著不同)。在超过一个或多个 TEB 的样本中,有 72%的样本对水蚤有显著毒性,而在所有 TEB 以下的样本中,有 18%的样本对水蚤有显著毒性。TEB 以下毒性的影响因素可能包括除农药以外的污染物的存在、沉积物的物理/化学特性以及 TEB 值的不确定性。正在对基准与沉积物化学和毒性的关系进行进一步评估。