Bingham Debra, Scheich Benjamin, Byfield Renée, Wilson Barbara, Bateman Brian T
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;45(2):227-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
To identify the presence or absence of 38 postpartum hemorrhage preparedness elements in hospitals in New Jersey and Georgia as a component of the Postpartum Hemorrhage Project of the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses.
Quality improvement baseline assessment survey.
Hospitals (N = 95) in New Jersey and Georgia.
Key informants were clinicians who were members of their hospitals' obstetric teams and were recognized as knowledgeable about their hospitals' postpartum hemorrhage policies.
An electronic survey was sent by e-mail to each identified hospital's key informant.
The mean number of elements present was 23.1 (SD = 5.2; range = 12-34). Volume of births, students, magnet status, and other hospital characteristics did not predict preparedness. None of the hospitals had all of the 38 preparedness elements available. Less than 50% of the hospitals had massive hemorrhage protocols, performed risk assessments and drills, or measured blood loss. For every 10% increase in the total percentage of African American women who gave birth, there was a decrease of one preparedness element.
Objective measures of preparedness are needed, because perceptions of preparedness were inconsistent with the number of preparedness elements reported.
作为妇女健康、产科和新生儿护士协会产后出血项目的一部分,确定新泽西州和佐治亚州的医院是否具备38项产后出血准备要素。
质量改进基线评估调查。
新泽西州和佐治亚州的医院(N = 95)。
关键信息提供者为医院产科团队成员,且被认为熟悉所在医院的产后出血政策。
通过电子邮件向每家确定的医院的关键信息提供者发送电子调查问卷。
存在的要素平均数量为23.1(标准差 = 5.2;范围 = 12 - 34)。分娩量、学生数量、磁石医院地位及其他医院特征无法预测准备情况。没有一家医院具备所有38项准备要素。不到50%的医院制定了大出血预案、进行了风险评估和演练或测量了失血量。分娩的非裔美国女性总百分比每增加10%,准备要素数量就减少一项。
需要对准备情况进行客观衡量,因为对准备情况的认知与所报告的准备要素数量不一致。