UNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
University of North Carolina Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):831-6. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13901. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
To compare primiparous and multiparous women who develop obstetric fistula (OF) and to assess predictors of fistula location.
Cross-sectional study.
Fistula Care Centre at Bwaila Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Women with OF who presented between September 2011 and July 2014 with a complete obstetric history were eligible for the study.
Women with OF were surveyed for their obstetric history. Women were classified as multiparous if prior vaginal or caesarean delivery was reported. The location of the fistula was determined at operation: OF involving the urethra, bladder neck, and midvagina were classified as low; OF involving the vaginal apex, cervix, uterus, and ureters were classified as high.
Demographic information was compared between primiparous and multiparous women using chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Multivariate logistic regression models were implemented to assess the relationship between variables of interest and fistula location.
During the study period, 533 women presented for repair, of which 452 (84.8%) were included in the analysis. The majority (56.6%) were multiparous when the fistula formed. Multiparous women were more likely to have laboured <1 day (62.4 versus 44.5%, P < 0.001), delivered a live-born infant (26.8 versus 17.9%, P = 0.026), and have a high fistula location (37.5 versus 11.2%, P < 0.001). Multiparity [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.27-9.12)] and history of caesarean delivery (aOR = 4.11, 95% CI 2.45-6.89) were associated with development of a high fistula.
Multiparity was common in our cohort, and these women were more likely to have a high fistula. Additional research is needed to understand the aetiology of high fistula including potential iatrogenic causes.
Multiparity and caesarean delivery were associated with a high tract fistula in our Malawian cohort.
比较初产妇和经产妇中发生产科瘘的情况,并评估瘘管位置的预测因素。
横断面研究。
马拉维利隆圭 Bwaila 医院瘘管治疗中心。
2011 年 9 月至 2014 年 7 月期间有完整产科病史且出现产科瘘的妇女符合研究条件。
对患有产科瘘的妇女进行调查,了解其产科史。如果报告有阴道分娩或剖宫产,则将妇女归类为经产妇。手术时确定瘘管位置:涉及尿道、膀胱颈和阴道中段的瘘管为低位;涉及阴道顶端、宫颈、子宫和输尿管的瘘管为高位。
采用卡方检验和曼-惠特尼 U 检验比较初产妇和经产妇的人口统计学信息。实施多变量逻辑回归模型评估感兴趣变量与瘘管位置之间的关系。
在研究期间,533 名妇女前来修复瘘管,其中 452 名(84.8%)纳入分析。当瘘管形成时,大多数(56.6%)为经产妇。经产妇更有可能分娩<1 天(62.4%比 44.5%,P<0.001)、分娩活产儿(26.8%比 17.9%,P=0.026)和出现高位瘘管(37.5%比 11.2%,P<0.001)。经产妇(调整优势比[aOR] = 4.55,95%置信区间[CI] 2.27-9.12))和剖宫产史(aOR = 4.11,95% CI 2.45-6.89)与高位瘘管的发生相关。
在我们的队列中,经产妇很常见,且这些妇女更有可能出现高位瘘管。需要进一步研究以了解高位瘘管的病因,包括潜在的医源性原因。
在马拉维的队列中,经产妇和剖宫产与高位生殖道瘘有关。