Yousuf Tariq, Brinton Taylor, Ahmed Khansa, Iskander Joy, Woznicka Daniel, Kramer Jason, Kopiec Adam, Chadaga Amar R, Ortiz Kathia
Department of Internal Medicine, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, IL, USA.
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Clin Med Res. 2016 Mar;8(3):190-5. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2452w. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is used emergently to dissolve thrombi in the treatment of fulminant pulmonary embolism. Currently, there is a relative contraindication to tPA in the setting of traumatic or prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation > 10 minutes because of the risk of massive hemorrhage.
Our single-center, retrospective study investigated patients experiencing cardiac arrest (CA) secondary to pulmonary embolus. We compared the effectiveness of advanced cardiac life support with the administration of tPA vs. the standard of care consisting of advanced cardiac life support without thrombolysis. The primary endpoint was survival to discharge. Secondary endpoints were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), major bleeding, and minor bleeding.
We analyzed 42 patients, of whom 19 received tPA during CA. Patients who received tPA were not associated with a statistically significant increase in survival to discharge (10.5% vs. 8.7%, P = 1.00) or ROSC (47.4% vs. 47.8%, P = 0.98) compared to the control group. We observed no statistically significant difference between the groups in major bleeding events (5.3% in the tPA group vs. 4.3% in the control group, P = 1.00) and minor bleeding events (10.5% in the tPA group vs. 0.0% in the control group, P = 0.11).
This study did not find a statistically significant difference in survival to discharge or in ROSC in patients treated with tPA during CA compared to patients treated with standard therapy. However, because no significant difference was found in major or minor bleeding, we suggest that the potential therapeutic benefits of this medication should not be limited by the potential for massive hemorrhage. Larger prospective studies are warranted to define the efficacy and safety profile of thrombolytic use in this population.
组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)在暴发性肺栓塞治疗中被紧急用于溶解血栓。目前,在创伤性或持续心肺复苏超过10分钟的情况下,由于存在大出血风险,tPA存在相对禁忌证。
我们的单中心回顾性研究调查了继发于肺栓塞的心脏骤停(CA)患者。我们比较了在高级心脏生命支持基础上给予tPA与不进行溶栓的高级心脏生命支持标准治疗的有效性。主要终点是出院存活率。次要终点是自主循环恢复(ROSC)、大出血和小出血。
我们分析了42例患者,其中19例在心脏骤停期间接受了tPA治疗。与对照组相比,接受tPA治疗的患者出院存活率(10.5%对8.7%,P = 1.00)或ROSC(47.4%对47.8%,P = 0.98)没有统计学上的显著增加。我们观察到两组在大出血事件(tPA组为5.3%,对照组为4.3%,P = 1.00)和小出血事件(tPA组为10.5%,对照组为0.0%,P = 0.11)方面没有统计学上的显著差异。
本研究发现,与接受标准治疗的患者相比,在心脏骤停期间接受tPA治疗的患者在出院存活率或ROSC方面没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,由于在大出血或小出血方面没有发现显著差异,我们认为这种药物的潜在治疗益处不应因大出血的可能性而受到限制。有必要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究来确定该人群使用溶栓药物的疗效和安全性。