Tasci Ozlem, Hatipoglu Osman Nuri, Cagli Bekir, Ermis Veli
Department of Pulmonology, Trakya University Medical Faculty, 22030, Edirne, Turkey.
Department of Radiology, Trakya University Medical Faculty, 22030, Edirne, Turkey.
J Clin Ultrasound. 2016 Jul 8;44(6):383-9. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22331. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
The primary purpose of our study was to compare the efficacies of two sonographic (US) probes, a high-frequency linear-array probe and a lower-frequency phased-array sector probe in the diagnosis of basic thoracic pathologies. The secondary purpose was to compare the diagnostic performance of thoracic US with auscultation and chest radiography (CXR) using thoracic CT as a gold standard.
In total, 55 consecutive patients scheduled for thoracic CT were enrolled in this prospective study. Four pathologic entities were evaluated: pneumothorax, pleural effusion, consolidation, and interstitial syndrome. A portable US scanner was used with a 5-10-MHz linear-array probe and a 1-5-MHz phased-array sector probe. The first probe used was chosen randomly. US, CXR, and auscultation results were compared with the CT results.
The linear-array probe had the highest performance in the identification of pneumothorax (83% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 99% diagnostic accuracy) and pleural effusion (100% sensitivity, 97% specificity, and 98% diagnostic accuracy); the sector probe had the highest performance in the identification of consolidation (89% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 95% diagnostic accuracy) and interstitial syndrome (94% sensitivity, 93% specificity, and 94% diagnostic accuracy). For all pathologies, the performance of US was superior to those of CXR and auscultation.
The linear probe is superior to the sector probe for identifying pleural pathologies, whereas the sector probe is superior to the linear probe for identifying parenchymal pathologies. Thoracic US has better diagnostic performance than CXR and auscultation for the diagnosis of common pathologic conditions of the chest. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 44:383-389, 2016.
本研究的主要目的是比较两种超声(US)探头,即高频线性阵列探头和低频相控阵扇形探头在诊断基本胸部病变中的效能。次要目的是将胸部超声与听诊及胸部X线摄影(CXR)的诊断性能进行比较,以胸部CT作为金标准。
总共55例计划进行胸部CT检查的连续患者纳入了这项前瞻性研究。评估了四种病理情况:气胸、胸腔积液、实变和间质综合征。使用便携式超声扫描仪,配备5 - 10MHz的线性阵列探头和1 - 5MHz的相控阵扇形探头。首先使用的探头是随机选择的。将超声、CXR和听诊结果与CT结果进行比较。
线性阵列探头在识别气胸(灵敏度83%、特异性100%、诊断准确率99%)和胸腔积液(灵敏度100%、特异性97%、诊断准确率98%)方面表现最佳;扇形探头在识别实变(灵敏度89%、特异性100%、诊断准确率95%)和间质综合征(灵敏度94%、特异性93%、诊断准确率94%)方面表现最佳。对于所有病变,超声的性能优于CXR和听诊。
线性探头在识别胸膜病变方面优于扇形探头,而扇形探头在识别实质病变方面优于线性探头。胸部超声在诊断胸部常见病理状况方面比CXR和听诊具有更好的诊断性能。© 2016威利期刊公司。《临床超声杂志》2016年第44卷:383 - 389页。