Poksinska Bozena Bonnie, Fialkowska-Filipek Malgorzata, Engström Jon
Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Computer Science and Management, Wroclaw University of Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Feb;26(2):95-103. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004290. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
Lean healthcare is claimed to contribute to improved patient satisfaction, but there is limited evidence to support this notion. This study investigates how primary-care centres working with Lean define and improve value from the patient's perspective, and how the application of Lean healthcare influences patient satisfaction.
This paper contains two qualitative case studies and a quantitative study based on results from the Swedish National Patient Survey. Through the case studies, we investigated how primary-care organisations realised the principle of defining and improving value from the patient's perspective. In the quantitative study, we compared results from the patient satisfaction survey for 23 primary-care centres working with Lean with a control group of 23 care centres not working with Lean. We also analysed changes in patient satisfaction over time.
Our case studies reveal that Lean healthcare implementations primarily target efficiency and little attention is paid to the patient's perspective. The quantitative study shows no significantly better results in patient satisfaction for primary-care centres working with Lean healthcare compared with those not working with Lean. Further, care centres working with Lean show no significant improvements in patient satisfaction over time.
Lean healthcare implementations seem to have a limited impact on improving patient satisfaction. Care providers need to pay more attention to integrating the patient's perspective in the application of Lean healthcare. Value needs to be defined and value streams need to be improved based on both the knowledge and clinical expertise of care providers, and the preferences and needs of patients.
精益医疗保健被认为有助于提高患者满意度,但支持这一观点的证据有限。本研究调查了采用精益方法的基层医疗中心如何从患者角度定义和提升价值,以及精益医疗保健的应用如何影响患者满意度。
本文包含两个定性案例研究以及一项基于瑞典国家患者调查结果的定量研究。通过案例研究,我们调查了基层医疗组织如何从患者角度实现定义和提升价值的原则。在定量研究中,我们将23个采用精益方法的基层医疗中心的患者满意度调查结果与23个未采用精益方法的对照医疗中心进行了比较。我们还分析了患者满意度随时间的变化。
我们的案例研究表明,精益医疗保健的实施主要以效率为目标,很少关注患者的角度。定量研究表明,与未采用精益医疗保健的中心相比,采用精益医疗保健的基层医疗中心在患者满意度方面没有显著更好的结果。此外,采用精益方法的医疗中心在患者满意度方面并没有随着时间的推移而显著提高。
精益医疗保健的实施似乎对提高患者满意度的影响有限。医疗服务提供者在应用精益医疗保健时需要更加关注融入患者的角度。需要根据医疗服务提供者的知识和临床专业技能以及患者的偏好和需求来定义价值并改进价值流。