Jungk Christine, Chatziaslanidou Despina, Ahmadi Rezvan, Capper David, Bermejo Justo Lorenzo, Exner Janina, von Deimling Andreas, Herold-Mende Christel, Unterberg Andreas
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Institute of Neuropathology, University of Heidelberg, INF 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
BMC Cancer. 2016 Feb 10;16:81. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2131-6.
To date, standardized strategies for the treatment of recurrent glioma are lacking. Chemotherapy with the alkylating agent BCNU (1,3-bis (2-chloroethyl)-1-nitroso-urea) is a therapeutic option even though its efficacy and safety, particularly the risk of pulmonary fibrosis, remains controversial. To address these issues, we performed a retrospective analysis on clinical outcome and side effects of BCNU-based chemotherapy in recurrent glioma.
Survival data of 34 mostly chemotherapy-naïve glioblastoma patients treated with BCNU at 1st relapse were compared to 29 untreated control patients, employing a multiple Cox regression model which considered known prognostic factors including MGMT promoter hypermethylation. Additionally, medical records of 163 patients treated with BCNU for recurrent glioma WHO grade II to IV were retrospectively evaluated for BCNU-related side effects classified according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 2.0.
In recurrent glioblastoma, multiple regression survival analysis revealed a significant benefit of BCNU-based chemotherapy on survival after relapse (p = 0.02; HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.26-0.89) independent of known clinical and molecular prognostic factors. Exploratory analyses suggested that survival benefit was most pronounced in MGMT-hypermethylated, BCNU-treated patients. Moreover, BCNU was well tolerated by 46% of the 163 patients analyzed for side effects; otherwise, predominantly mild side effects occurred (CTCAE I/II; 45%). Severe side effects CTCAE III/IV were observed in 9% of patients including severe hematotoxicity, thromboembolism, intracranial hemorrhage and injection site reaction requiring surgical intervention. One patient presented with a clinically apparent pulmonary fibrosis CTCAE IV requiring temporary mechanical ventilation.
In this study, BCNU was rarely associated with severe side effects, particularly pulmonary toxicity, and, in case of recurrent glioblastoma, even conferred a favorable outcome. Therefore BCNU appears to be an appropriate alternative to other nitrosoureas although the efficacy against newer drugs needs further evaluation.
迄今为止,复发性胶质瘤仍缺乏标准化的治疗策略。使用烷化剂卡莫司汀(1,3-双(2-氯乙基)-1-亚硝基脲)进行化疗是一种治疗选择,尽管其疗效和安全性,尤其是肺纤维化风险仍存在争议。为解决这些问题,我们对复发性胶质瘤中基于卡莫司汀的化疗的临床结果和副作用进行了回顾性分析。
将34例首次复发时接受卡莫司汀治疗的多为未接受过化疗的胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存数据与29例未接受治疗的对照患者进行比较,采用多因素Cox回归模型,该模型考虑了包括MGMT启动子高甲基化在内的已知预后因素。此外,回顾性评估了163例接受卡莫司汀治疗的WHO II至IV级复发性胶质瘤患者的病历,以了解根据美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用毒性标准(CTCAE)第2.0版分类的与卡莫司汀相关的副作用。
在复发性胶质母细胞瘤中,多因素回归生存分析显示,基于卡莫司汀的化疗对复发后的生存有显著益处(p = 0.02;HR = 0.48;95% CI = 0.26 - 0.89),与已知的临床和分子预后因素无关。探索性分析表明,生存获益在MGMT高甲基化且接受卡莫司汀治疗的患者中最为明显。此外,在分析副作用的163例患者中,46%对卡莫司汀耐受性良好;否则,主要出现轻度副作用(CTCAE I/II;45%)。9%的患者出现严重副作用CTCAE III/IV,包括严重血液毒性、血栓栓塞、颅内出血和需要手术干预的注射部位反应。1例患者出现临床上明显的CTCAE IV级肺纤维化,需要临时机械通气。
在本研究中,卡莫司汀很少与严重副作用相关,尤其是肺毒性,并且在复发性胶质母细胞瘤的情况下,甚至能带来良好的预后。因此,尽管对新型药物的疗效需要进一步评估,但卡莫司汀似乎是其他亚硝基脲类药物的合适替代品。