Suppr超能文献

复发性胶质瘤患者使用卡莫司汀化疗:初治患者的临床疗效及副作用分析

Chemotherapy with BCNU in recurrent glioma: Analysis of clinical outcome and side effects in chemotherapy-naïve patients.

作者信息

Jungk Christine, Chatziaslanidou Despina, Ahmadi Rezvan, Capper David, Bermejo Justo Lorenzo, Exner Janina, von Deimling Andreas, Herold-Mende Christel, Unterberg Andreas

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Institute of Neuropathology, University of Heidelberg, INF 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2016 Feb 10;16:81. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2131-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To date, standardized strategies for the treatment of recurrent glioma are lacking. Chemotherapy with the alkylating agent BCNU (1,3-bis (2-chloroethyl)-1-nitroso-urea) is a therapeutic option even though its efficacy and safety, particularly the risk of pulmonary fibrosis, remains controversial. To address these issues, we performed a retrospective analysis on clinical outcome and side effects of BCNU-based chemotherapy in recurrent glioma.

METHODS

Survival data of 34 mostly chemotherapy-naïve glioblastoma patients treated with BCNU at 1st relapse were compared to 29 untreated control patients, employing a multiple Cox regression model which considered known prognostic factors including MGMT promoter hypermethylation. Additionally, medical records of 163 patients treated with BCNU for recurrent glioma WHO grade II to IV were retrospectively evaluated for BCNU-related side effects classified according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 2.0.

RESULTS

In recurrent glioblastoma, multiple regression survival analysis revealed a significant benefit of BCNU-based chemotherapy on survival after relapse (p = 0.02; HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.26-0.89) independent of known clinical and molecular prognostic factors. Exploratory analyses suggested that survival benefit was most pronounced in MGMT-hypermethylated, BCNU-treated patients. Moreover, BCNU was well tolerated by 46% of the 163 patients analyzed for side effects; otherwise, predominantly mild side effects occurred (CTCAE I/II; 45%). Severe side effects CTCAE III/IV were observed in 9% of patients including severe hematotoxicity, thromboembolism, intracranial hemorrhage and injection site reaction requiring surgical intervention. One patient presented with a clinically apparent pulmonary fibrosis CTCAE IV requiring temporary mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSION

In this study, BCNU was rarely associated with severe side effects, particularly pulmonary toxicity, and, in case of recurrent glioblastoma, even conferred a favorable outcome. Therefore BCNU appears to be an appropriate alternative to other nitrosoureas although the efficacy against newer drugs needs further evaluation.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,复发性胶质瘤仍缺乏标准化的治疗策略。使用烷化剂卡莫司汀(1,3-双(2-氯乙基)-1-亚硝基脲)进行化疗是一种治疗选择,尽管其疗效和安全性,尤其是肺纤维化风险仍存在争议。为解决这些问题,我们对复发性胶质瘤中基于卡莫司汀的化疗的临床结果和副作用进行了回顾性分析。

方法

将34例首次复发时接受卡莫司汀治疗的多为未接受过化疗的胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存数据与29例未接受治疗的对照患者进行比较,采用多因素Cox回归模型,该模型考虑了包括MGMT启动子高甲基化在内的已知预后因素。此外,回顾性评估了163例接受卡莫司汀治疗的WHO II至IV级复发性胶质瘤患者的病历,以了解根据美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用毒性标准(CTCAE)第2.0版分类的与卡莫司汀相关的副作用。

结果

在复发性胶质母细胞瘤中,多因素回归生存分析显示,基于卡莫司汀的化疗对复发后的生存有显著益处(p = 0.02;HR = 0.48;95% CI = 0.26 - 0.89),与已知的临床和分子预后因素无关。探索性分析表明,生存获益在MGMT高甲基化且接受卡莫司汀治疗的患者中最为明显。此外,在分析副作用的163例患者中,46%对卡莫司汀耐受性良好;否则,主要出现轻度副作用(CTCAE I/II;45%)。9%的患者出现严重副作用CTCAE III/IV,包括严重血液毒性、血栓栓塞、颅内出血和需要手术干预的注射部位反应。1例患者出现临床上明显的CTCAE IV级肺纤维化,需要临时机械通气。

结论

在本研究中,卡莫司汀很少与严重副作用相关,尤其是肺毒性,并且在复发性胶质母细胞瘤的情况下,甚至能带来良好的预后。因此,尽管对新型药物的疗效需要进一步评估,但卡莫司汀似乎是其他亚硝基脲类药物的合适替代品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d0f/4748520/7a549253cdb2/12885_2016_2131_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
MGMT promoter methylation status and prognosis of patients with primary or recurrent glioblastoma treated with carmustine wafers.
Br J Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;27(6):772-8. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2013.791664. Epub 2013 May 11.
3
Incorporating BCNU wafers into malignant glioma treatment: European case studies.
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(3):195-204. doi: 10.2165/11532900-000000000-00000.
4
Carmustine (BCNU) plus Teniposide (VM26) in recurrent malignant glioma.
Oncology. 2014;86(5-6):369-72. doi: 10.1159/000360295. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
5
[Risk Factors for Adverse Events after Implantation of BCNU Wafers in High-grade Gliomas].
No Shinkei Geka. 2015 Jul;43(7):603-10. doi: 10.11477/mf.1436203084.
7
Safety profile of carmustine wafers in malignant glioma: a review of controlled trials and a decade of clinical experience.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Nov;24(11):3239-57. doi: 10.1185/03007990802508180. Epub 2008 Oct 20.
9
Phase 1 trial of irinotecan plus BCNU in patients with progressive or recurrent malignant glioma.
Neuro Oncol. 2004 Apr;6(2):145-53. doi: 10.1215/S1152851703000498.
10
Evaluation of toxicity of carmustine with or without bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or progressive high grade gliomas.
J Neurooncol. 2019 Oct;145(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03266-0. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Signaling Pathways in Gliomas.
Genes (Basel). 2025 May 19;16(5):600. doi: 10.3390/genes16050600.
3
Advances in Glioblastoma Therapy: An Update on Current Approaches.
Brain Sci. 2023 Oct 31;13(11):1536. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13111536.
5
SEOM-GEINO clinical guidelines for high-grade gliomas of adulthood (2022).
Clin Transl Oncol. 2023 Sep;25(9):2634-2646. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03245-y. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
6
Personalized Treatment of Glioblastoma: Current State and Future Perspective.
Biomedicines. 2023 May 30;11(6):1579. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11061579.
7
Chemical Activation and Mechanical Sensitization of Piezo1 Enhance TRAIL-Mediated Apoptosis in Glioblastoma Cells.
ACS Omega. 2023 May 3;8(19):16975-16986. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00705. eCollection 2023 May 16.
8
Carmustine Wafers Implantation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed High Grade Glioma: Is It Still an Option?
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 23;13:884158. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.884158. eCollection 2022.
9
Lung toxicity of lomustine in the treatment of progressive gliomas.
Neurooncol Adv. 2022 May 10;4(1):vdac068. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac068. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
10
The road-map for establishment of a prognostic molecular marker panel in glioma using liquid biopsy: current status and future directions.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2022 Sep;24(9):1702-1714. doi: 10.1007/s12094-022-02833-8. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma.
Cell. 2013 Oct 10;155(2):462-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.034.
2
Multiple resections for patients with glioblastoma: prolonging survival.
J Neurosurg. 2013 Apr;118(4):812-20. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.JNS1277. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
3
Impact of extent of resection for recurrent glioblastoma on overall survival: clinical article.
J Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;117(6):1032-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.JNS12504. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
4
Generation and validation of a prognostic score to predict outcome after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma.
Acta Oncol. 2013 Jan;52(1):147-52. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.692882. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
5
The efficacy of temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.
Eur J Neurol. 2013 Feb;20(2):223-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03778.x. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
6
Temozolomide dosing regimens for glioma patients.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012 Jun;12(3):286-93. doi: 10.1007/s11910-012-0262-y.
7
O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in glioma therapy: promise and problems.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Aug;1826(1):71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 8.
8
Molecular markers in low-grade gliomas: predictive or prognostic?
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Jul 1;17(13):4588-99. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3194. Epub 2011 May 10.
9
Bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a meta-analysis.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011 Apr;9(4):403-7. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2011.0037.
10
Controversies in the adjuvant therapy of high-grade gliomas.
Oncologist. 2011;16(3):351-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0335. Epub 2011 Feb 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验