Krishna Murli, Nadler Steven G
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Princeton, NJ , USA.
Front Immunol. 2016 Feb 2;7:21. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00021. eCollection 2016.
Biological molecules are increasingly becoming a part of the therapeutics portfolio that has been either recently approved for marketing or those that are in the pipeline of several biotech and pharmaceutical companies. This is largely based on their ability to be highly specific relative to small molecules. However, by virtue of being a large protein, and having a complex structure with structural variability arising from production using recombinant gene technology in cell lines, such therapeutics run the risk of being recognized as foreign by a host immune system. In the context of immune-mediated adverse effects that have been documented to biological drugs thus far, including infusion reactions, and the evolving therapeutic platforms in the pipeline that engineer different functional modules in a biotherapeutic, it is critical to understand the interplay of the adaptive and innate immune responses, the pathophysiology of immunogenicity to biological drugs in instances where there have been immune-mediated adverse clinical sequelae and address technical approaches for their laboratory evaluation. The current paradigm in immunogenicity evaluation has a tiered approach to the detection and characterization of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) elicited in vivo to a biotherapeutic; alongside with the structural, biophysical, and molecular information of the therapeutic, these analytical assessments form the core of the immunogenicity risk assessment. However, many of the immune-mediated adverse effects attributed to ADAs require the formation of a drug/ADA immune complex (IC) intermediate that can have a variety of downstream effects. This review will focus on the activation of potential immunopathological pathways arising as a consequence of circulating as well as cell surface bound drug bearing ICs, risk factors that are intrinsic either to the therapeutic molecule or to the host that might predispose to IC-mediated effects, and review the recent literature on prevalence and intensity of established examples of type II and III hypersensitivity reactions that follow the administration of a biotherapeutic. Additionally, we propose methods for the study of immune parameters specific to the biology of ICs that could be of use in conjunction with the detection of ADAs in circulation.
生物分子正日益成为治疗药物组合的一部分,这些药物要么最近已获批上市,要么正处于多家生物技术和制药公司的研发进程中。这在很大程度上是基于它们相对于小分子具有高度特异性的能力。然而,由于生物分子是大型蛋白质,且具有复杂的结构,其结构变异性源于在细胞系中使用重组基因技术进行生产,这类治疗药物存在被宿主免疫系统识别为外来物的风险。就迄今为止已记录在案的生物药物免疫介导的不良反应(包括输注反应)以及正在研发的、在生物治疗药物中设计不同功能模块的不断发展的治疗平台而言,了解适应性免疫反应和先天性免疫反应的相互作用、在出现免疫介导的不良临床后遗症的情况下生物药物免疫原性的病理生理学以及解决其实验室评估的技术方法至关重要。目前免疫原性评估的范式采用分层方法来检测和表征体内针对生物治疗药物产生的抗药物抗体(ADA);连同治疗药物的结构、生物物理和分子信息,这些分析评估构成了免疫原性风险评估的核心。然而,许多归因于ADA的免疫介导的不良反应需要形成药物/ADA免疫复合物(IC)中间体,该中间体可产生多种下游效应。本综述将聚焦于由于循环以及细胞表面结合的携带IC的药物而引发的潜在免疫病理途径的激活、治疗分子或宿主内在的可能易引发IC介导效应的风险因素,并综述关于生物治疗药物给药后II型和III型超敏反应既定实例的发生率和强度的近期文献。此外,我们提出了研究特定于IC生物学的免疫参数的方法,这些方法可与循环中ADA的检测结合使用。