Chen Yan Q, Pottanat Thomas G, Carter Quincy L, Troutt Jason S, Konrad Robert J, Sloan John H
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, United States.
J Immunol Methods. 2016 Apr;431:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
Increased emphasis on the development of biologics has placed a significant focus on anti-drug antibody (ADA) detection. To address this need, several immunoassay formats have been described for use in characterizing potential immune responses. Two commonly utilized methods include the affinity capture elution (ACE) and bridging formats. While these approaches have been effective in supporting many clinical initiatives, both possess potential disadvantages. Here, we compare these standard methods to a novel format that addresses these noted drawbacks.
A novel assay format has been designed to incorporate the benefits of the ACE and bridging methods while overcoming the disadvantages incurred with each approach. The described ACE-Bridge format exhibits excellent sensitivity and precision while providing superior drug tolerance when compared to bridging formats. Further, this assay format is not susceptible to the endogenous target interference that can be an issue in the ACE format.
The ACE-Bridge format provides an often superior option as a screening method to monitor patient ADA responses. This method is unique in its ability to measure ADA in the presence of high circulating endogenous target concentrations (>100 ng/mL) while demonstrating very high drug tolerance.
对生物制剂开发的日益重视使得抗药物抗体(ADA)检测成为一个重要焦点。为满足这一需求,已描述了几种免疫测定形式用于表征潜在的免疫反应。两种常用方法包括亲和捕获洗脱(ACE)和桥接形式。虽然这些方法在支持许多临床项目方面很有效,但都有潜在的缺点。在此,我们将这些标准方法与一种解决这些缺点的新形式进行比较。
设计了一种新的测定形式,结合了ACE和桥接方法的优点,同时克服了每种方法所带来的缺点。与桥接形式相比,所描述的ACE-桥接形式表现出优异的灵敏度和精密度,同时具有更高的药物耐受性。此外,这种测定形式不易受到ACE形式中可能出现的内源性靶标干扰。
ACE-桥接形式作为监测患者ADA反应的筛选方法通常提供了一个更好的选择。该方法的独特之处在于,在高循环内源性靶标浓度(>100 ng/mL)存在的情况下能够测量ADA,同时表现出非常高的药物耐受性。