Garcia Marco Antonio Cavalcanti, Catunda João Marcos Yamasaki, de Souza Marcio Nogueira, Fontana Ana Paula, Sperandei Sandro, Vargas Claudia D
Laboratório de Instrumentação Biomédica, Programa de Engenharia Biomédica, COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Horácio Macedo 2030, CT, Bloco H, Sala 327, Cidade Universitária, 21941-914 Ilha do Fundão, RJ, Brazil; Laboratório de Neurobiologia II, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho 373, CCS, Bloco G, Sala G1-019, Cidade Universitária, 21941-902 Ilha do Fundão, RJ, Brazil; Departamento de Biociências da Atividade Física, Escola de Educação Física e Desportos, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho 540, Cidade Universitária, 21941-599 Ilha do Fundão, RJ, Brazil.
Laboratório de Instrumentação Biomédica, Programa de Engenharia Biomédica, COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Horácio Macedo 2030, CT, Bloco H, Sala 327, Cidade Universitária, 21941-914 Ilha do Fundão, RJ, Brazil.
Neural Plast. 2016;2016:3034963. doi: 10.1155/2016/3034963. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
Somatosensory electrical stimulation (SES) has been proposed as an approach to treat patients with sensory-motor impairment such as spasticity. However, there is still no consensus regarding which would be the adequate SES parameters to treat those deficits. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of applying SES over the forearm muscles at four different frequencies of stimulation (3, 30, 150, and 300 Hz) and in two intervals of time (5' and 30') by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation and Hoffmann's reflex (H-reflex) in healthy volunteers (Experiments I and II). A group of stroke patients (Experiment III) was also preliminary evaluated to ascertain SES effects at a low frequency (3 Hz) applied for 30' over the forearm spastic flexors muscles by measuring the wrist joint passive torque. Motor evoked potentials and the H-reflex were collected from different forearm and hand muscles immediately before and after SES and up to 5' (Experiment I) and 10' (Experiments I and II) later. None of the investigated frequencies of SES was able to operate as a key in switching modulatory effects in the central nervous system of healthy volunteers and stroke patients with spasticity.
体感电刺激(SES)已被提议作为一种治疗感觉运动障碍患者(如痉挛患者)的方法。然而,对于治疗这些缺陷的合适SES参数仍未达成共识。因此,本研究的目的是通过经颅磁刺激和霍夫曼反射(H反射),评估在健康志愿者中(实验I和II),以四种不同刺激频率(3、30、150和300Hz)以及两个时间间隔(5分钟和30分钟)对前臂肌肉施加SES的效果。还对一组中风患者(实验III)进行了初步评估,通过测量腕关节被动扭矩,确定在30分钟内对前臂痉挛性屈肌施加低频(3Hz)SES的效果。在SES前后以及之后5分钟(实验I)和10分钟(实验I和II),从不同的前臂和手部肌肉收集运动诱发电位和H反射。所研究的SES频率均无法作为调节健康志愿者和痉挛性中风患者中枢神经系统调节作用的关键因素。