Suppr超能文献

日本国内外制药公司在药品生命周期管理方案的战略平衡方面存在差异。

Strategic balance of drug lifecycle management options differs between domestic and foreign companies in Japan.

机构信息

a Innovation Policy Research Unit, Department of Computational Biology, and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences , The University of Tokyo , Kashiwa-shi , Chiba , Japan.

出版信息

Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2016;26(4):497-503. doi: 10.1517/13543776.2016.1154944. Epub 2016 Mar 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Drug approvals and patent protections are critical in drug lifecycle management (LCM) in order to maximize drug discovery investment returns.

AREA COVERED

We analyzed drug LCM activities implemented by 10 top companies in Japan, focusing on drug approvals and patent term extensions.

EXPERT OPINION

Foreign companies acquired numerous drug approvals primarily for new molecular entities (NMEs), while Japanese companies mainly obtained approvals for improved drugs including new indications, and intensively extended patent terms. Furthermore, we discovered three factors likely responsible for differences in drug LCM strategies of Japanese and foreign companies: research and development capacities for drugs, drug lags of foreign-origin NMEs, and cooperation between Research and Development Departments and Intellectual Property Departments.

摘要

简介

为了实现药物研发投资回报的最大化,药物生命周期管理(LCM)中的药物批准和专利保护至关重要。

涵盖领域

我们分析了日本 10 家顶尖公司实施的药物 LCM 活动,重点关注药物批准和专利期限延长。

专家意见

外国公司主要通过获得新药批准(主要是新分子实体[NME])获得了大量的药物批准,而日本公司主要通过获得新药批准(包括新适应症的改进药物)并积极延长专利期限来获得批准。此外,我们发现了可能导致日美公司药物 LCM 策略差异的三个因素:药物研发能力、外国 NME 的药物滞后以及研发部门和知识产权部门之间的合作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验