Akhtar M, Tchou P, Jazayeri M
Electrophysiology Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Clinical Campus, Sinai Samaritan Medical Center 53201.
Circulation. 1989 Dec;80(6 Suppl):IV31-9.
In clinical arrhythmias, the main therapeutic role of calcium channel entry blockers is related to their effect on the sinus and atrioventricular (AV) node. Consequently, in cardiac arrhythmias where the AV node is part of the reentry circuit, a beneficial effect of diltiazem and verapamil can be demonstrated. These include AV nodal reentry and orthodromic tachycardia in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. In addition, the ventricular response by the AV node during atrial tachycardias can also be controlled with these agents. A specific type of ventricular tachycardia seen in the absence of structural heart disease has also been reported to respond to intravenous and oral verapamil. Calcium channel blockers have no proven depressant effect on accessory pathway conduction. Similarly, the value of these agents in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia in association with chronic coronary artery disease and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy is rather limited. The use of calcium entry blockers in patients with wide QRS tachycardia, therefore, is to be discouraged unless it can be proved that supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant conduction is the underlying basis.
在临床心律失常中,钙通道阻滞剂的主要治疗作用与其对窦房结和房室(AV)结的作用有关。因此,在房室结作为折返环路一部分的心律失常中,地尔硫䓬和维拉帕米可显示出有益作用。这些心律失常包括房室结折返性心动过速以及预激综合征患者的顺向性心动过速。此外,这些药物还可控制房性心动过速时房室结的心室反应。据报道,一种在无结构性心脏病情况下出现的特定类型室性心动过速对静脉注射和口服维拉帕米也有反应。钙通道阻滞剂对旁路传导没有已证实的抑制作用。同样,这些药物在治疗与慢性冠状动脉疾病和特发性扩张型心肌病相关的室性心动过速方面的价值相当有限。因此,除非能证明伴差异传导的室上性心动过速是其潜在病因,否则不鼓励在宽QRS波心动过速患者中使用钙通道阻滞剂。