Ryan William F
a Department of Meteorology , The Pennsylvania State University, University Park , Pennsylvania , USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2016 Jun;66(6):576-96. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1151469.
Air quality forecasting is a recent development, with most programs initiated only in the last 20 years. During the last decade, forecast preparation procedure-the forecast rote-has changed dramatically. This paper summarizes the unique challenges posed by air quality forecasting, details the current forecast rote, and analyzes prospects for future improvements. Because air quality forecasts must diagnose and predict several pollutants and their precursors in addition to standard meteorological variables, it is, compared with weather forecasts, a higher-uncertainty forecast. Forecasters seek to contain the uncertainty by "anchoring" the forecast, using an a priori field, and then "adjusting" the forecast using additional information. The air quality a priori, or first guess, field is a blend of past, current, and near-term future observations of the pollutants of interest, on both local and regional scales, and is typically coupled with predicted air parcel trajectories. Until recently, statistical methods, based on long-term training data sets, were used to adjust the first guess. However, reductions in precursor emissions in the United States, beginning in the late 1990s and continuing to the present, eroded the stationarity assumption for the training data sets and degraded forecast skill. Beginning in the mid-2000s, output from modified numerical air quality prediction (NAQP) models, originally developed to test pollution control strategies, became available in near real time for forecast support. The current adjustment process begins with the analyses and postprocessing of individual NAQP models and their ad hoc ensembles, often in concert with new statistical techniques. The final adjustment step uses forecaster expertise to assess the impact of mesoscale features not resolved by the NAQP models. It is expected that advances in model resolution, chemical data assimilation, and the formulation of emissions fields will improve mesoscale predictions by NAQP models and drive future changes in the forecast rote.
Routine air quality forecasts are now issued for nearly all the major U.S. metropolitan areas. Methods of forecast preparation-the forecast rote-have changed significantly in the last decade. Numerical air quality models have matured and are now an indispensable part of the forecasting process. All forecasting methods, particularly statistically based models, must be continually calibrated to account for ongoing local- and regional-scale emission reductions.
空气质量预报是一项新兴事物,大多数相关项目都是在过去20年才启动的。在过去十年中,预报编制程序——即预报流程——发生了巨大变化。本文总结了空气质量预报带来的独特挑战,详述了当前的预报流程,并分析了未来改进的前景。由于空气质量预报除了要诊断和预测标准气象变量外,还必须诊断和预测多种污染物及其前体,因此与天气预报相比,它是一种不确定性更高的预报。预报员试图通过“锚定”预报(使用先验场),然后利用额外信息“调整”预报来控制不确定性。空气质量先验场或初始猜测场是对感兴趣污染物在本地和区域尺度上的过去、当前及近期未来观测值的综合,通常与预测的气块轨迹相结合。直到最近,基于长期训练数据集的统计方法还被用于调整初始猜测。然而,美国自20世纪90年代末至今持续的前体排放减少,破坏了训练数据集的平稳性假设并降低了预报技能。从21世纪中期开始,最初用于测试污染控制策略的改进型数值空气质量预测(NAQP)模型的输出能够近实时获取以支持预报。当前的调整过程始于对单个NAQP模型及其临时集合的分析和后处理,通常还会结合新的统计技术。最后的调整步骤利用预报员的专业知识来评估NAQP模型未解析的中尺度特征的影响。预计模型分辨率、化学数据同化和排放场公式的进展将改善NAQP模型的中尺度预测并推动未来预报流程的变革。
现在几乎美国所有主要大都市地区都发布常规空气质量预报。在过去十年中,预报编制方法——即预报流程——发生了显著变化。数值空气质量模型已经成熟,现在是预报过程中不可或缺的一部分。所有预报方法,尤其是基于统计的模型,必须不断校准以适应持续的本地和区域尺度的排放减少。