Bhutani Kunal, Nazor Kristopher L, Williams Roy, Tran Ha, Dai Heng, Džakula Željko, Cho Edward H, Pang Andy W C, Rao Mahendra, Cao Han, Schork Nicholas J, Loring Jeanne F
Scripps Translational Science Institute and The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine. La Jolla, California 92037. USA.
The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Chemical Physiology, Center for Regenerative Medicine, La Jolla, California 92037 USA.
Nat Commun. 2016 Feb 19;7:10536. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10536.
There is concern that the stresses of inducing pluripotency may lead to deleterious DNA mutations in induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines, which would compromise their use for cell therapies. Here we report comparative genomic analysis of nine isogenic iPSC lines generated using three reprogramming methods: integrating retroviral vectors, non-integrating Sendai virus and synthetic mRNAs. We used whole-genome sequencing and de novo genome mapping to identify single-nucleotide variants, insertions and deletions, and structural variants. Our results show a moderate number of variants in the iPSCs that were not evident in the parental fibroblasts, which may result from reprogramming. There were only small differences in the total numbers and types of variants among different reprogramming methods. Most importantly, a thorough genomic analysis showed that the variants were generally benign. We conclude that the process of reprogramming is unlikely to introduce variants that would make the cells inappropriate for therapy.
有人担心诱导多能性的压力可能会导致诱导多能干细胞(iPSC)系中出现有害的DNA突变,这会影响它们在细胞治疗中的应用。在此,我们报告了对使用三种重编程方法生成的九个同基因iPSC系的比较基因组分析:整合逆转录病毒载体、非整合仙台病毒和合成mRNA。我们使用全基因组测序和从头基因组图谱来识别单核苷酸变体、插入和缺失以及结构变体。我们的结果显示,iPSC中存在一定数量的变体,这些变体在亲本成纤维细胞中并不明显,这可能是重编程导致的。不同重编程方法之间在变体的总数和类型上只有微小差异。最重要的是,全面的基因组分析表明这些变体通常是良性的。我们得出结论,重编程过程不太可能引入会使细胞不适用于治疗的变体。