Kamiya Hajime, Cho Bo-Hyun, Messonnier Mark L, Clark Thomas A, Liang Jennifer L
Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, United States; Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Disease Branch, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, United States; National Institute of Infectious Diseases, 1-23-1 Toyama, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan.
Assessment Branch, Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, United States.
Vaccine. 2016 Apr 4;34(15):1832-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.02.027. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
The United States experienced a substantial increase in reported pertussis cases over the last decade. Since 2005, persons 11 years and older have been routinely recommended to receive a single dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the potential impact and cost-effectiveness of recommending a second dose of Tdap.
A static cohort model was used to calculate the epidemiologic and economic impact of adding a second dose of Tdap at age 16 or 21 years. Projected costs and outcomes were examined from a societal perspective over a 20-year period. Quality-adjusted Life Years (QALY) saved were calculated.
Using baseline pertussis incidence from the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System, Tdap revaccination at either age 16 or 21 years would reduce outpatient visits by 433 (5%) and 285 (4%), and hospitalization cases by 7 (7%) and 5 (5%), respectively. The costs per QALY saved with a second dose of Tdap were approximately US $19.7 million (16 years) and $26.2 million (21 years). In sensitivity analyses, incidence most influenced the model; as incidence increased, the costs per QALY decreased. To a lesser degree, initial vaccine effectiveness and waning of effectiveness also affected cost outcomes. Multivariate sensitivity analyses showed that under a set of optimistic assumptions, the cost per QALY saved would be approximately $163,361 (16 years) and $204,556 (21 years).
A second dose of Tdap resulted in a slight decrease in the number of cases and other outcomes, and that trend is more apparent when revaccinating at age 16 years than at age 21 years. Both revaccination strategies had high dollar per QALY saved even under optimistic assumptions in a multivariate sensitivity analysis.
在过去十年中,美国报告的百日咳病例大幅增加。自2005年以来,常规建议11岁及以上人群接种一剂破伤风类毒素、低剂量白喉类毒素和无细胞百日咳(Tdap)疫苗。本分析的目的是评估推荐接种第二剂Tdap的潜在影响和成本效益。
使用静态队列模型计算在16岁或21岁时增加一剂Tdap的流行病学和经济影响。从社会角度在20年期间检查预计成本和结果。计算节省的质量调整生命年(QALY)。
根据国家法定传染病监测系统的百日咳基线发病率,在16岁或21岁时再次接种Tdap分别可减少门诊就诊433次(5%)和285次(4%),以及住院病例7例(7%)和5例(5%)。接种第二剂Tdap每节省一个QALY的成本约为1970万美元(16岁)和2620万美元(21岁)。在敏感性分析中,发病率对模型影响最大;随着发病率增加,每QALY的成本降低。在较小程度上,初始疫苗效力和效力减弱也影响成本结果。多变量敏感性分析表明,在一组乐观假设下,每节省一个QALY的成本约为163361美元(16岁)和204556美元(21岁)。
接种第二剂Tdap导致病例数和其他结果略有减少,且在16岁时再次接种比在21岁时再次接种这种趋势更明显。在多变量敏感性分析中,即使在乐观假设下,两种再次接种策略每节省一个QALY的成本都很高。