Suppr超能文献

德国20%的1型糖尿病患者从每日多次注射转换为持续皮下胰岛素输注的事件和成本抵消:一个4年的模拟模型。

Event and Cost Offsets of Switching 20% of the Type 1 Diabetes Population in Germany From Multiple Daily Injections to Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: A 4-Year Simulation Model.

作者信息

Zöllner York Francis, Ziegler Ralph, Stüve Magnus, Krumreich Julia, Schauf Marion

机构信息

Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany

Diabetes Clinic for Children and Adolescents, Muenster, Germany.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 22;10(5):1142-8. doi: 10.1177/1932296816633720. Print 2016 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) administer insulin by multiple daily injections (MDI). However, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy has been shown to improve glycemic control compared with MDI.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to determine the key medical event and cost offsets generated over a 4-year period by introducing CSII to T1D patients who have inadequately controlled glucose metabolism on MDI in Germany.

METHODS

A decision-analytic budget impact model, simulating a treatment switch scenario, was developed. In the base case, all T1D patients received MDI, while in the switch scenario, 20% of the eligible T1D population, randomly selected, moved to CSII. The model focused on 2 medical endpoints and their corresponding cost offsets: severe hypoglycemic events requiring hospitalization (SHEH) and complication-borne diabetic events (CDEs) avoided. Event rates and costs were taken from the literature and official sources, adopting a health insurance perspective.

RESULTS

Compared with the base case, treating 20% of patients with CSII in the switch scenario resulted in 47 864 fewer SHEH and 5543 fewer CDEs. This led to total cost offsets of €183 085 281 within the 4-year time horizon. Of these, 92% were driven by avoided SHEH. Compared to an expected budget impact (cost increase) of 83%, only treatment costs considered, the total impact of the switch scenario amounted merely to a 24.5% increase in costs (reduction by 58.5% points; a factor of 3.4).

CONCLUSION

The use of CSII resulted in fewer SHEH and CDEs compared to MDI. The incurred CSII implementation costs are hence offset to a substantial degree by cost savings in complication treatment.

摘要

背景

大多数1型糖尿病(T1D)患者通过每日多次注射(MDI)来使用胰岛素。然而,与MDI相比,持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)疗法已被证明能改善血糖控制。

目的

目的是确定在德国,将CSII引入到使用MDI但糖代谢控制不佳的T1D患者中,在4年期间所产生的关键医疗事件和成本抵消情况。

方法

开发了一个决策分析预算影响模型,模拟治疗转换情景。在基础情景中,所有T1D患者接受MDI治疗,而在转换情景中,随机选择20%符合条件的T1D患者转而接受CSII治疗。该模型关注2个医疗终点及其相应的成本抵消情况:需要住院治疗的严重低血糖事件(SHEH)和避免的并发症引发的糖尿病事件(CDE)。事件发生率和成本取自文献和官方来源,采用医疗保险视角。

结果

与基础情景相比,在转换情景中对20%的患者采用CSII治疗,导致SHEH减少47864例,CDE减少5543例。这在4年时间范围内带来了总计183085281欧元的成本抵消。其中,92%是由避免的SHEH驱动的。与仅考虑治疗成本时预期的预算影响(成本增加)83%相比,转换情景的总影响仅使成本增加了24.5%(降低了5八个百分点;系数为3.4)。

结论

与MDI相比,使用CSII导致SHEH和CDE减少。因此,CSII实施所产生的成本在很大程度上被并发症治疗的成本节省所抵消。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Health-economic analysis of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in people with Type 1 diabetes.
Diabet Med. 2015 May;32(5):618-26. doi: 10.1111/dme.12661. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
9
10
Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in type 1 diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):311-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002853. Epub 2010 Jun 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验