Gueye Aliou B, Trigo Jose M, Vemuri Kiran V, Makriyannis Alexandros, Le Foll Bernard
aTranslational Addiction Research Laboratory bAlcohol Research and Treatment Clinic, Addiction Medicine Services, Ambulatory Care and Structured Treatments cCampbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Departments of dFamily and Community Medicine ePharmacology fDepartment of Psychiatry, Division of Brain and Therapeutics gInstitute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada hDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Center for Drug Discovery, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Behav Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;27(2-3 Spec Issue):258-69. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000222.
It is estimated that 0.6-1% of the population in the USA and Canada fulfil the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. (DSM-5) criteria for gambling disorders (GD). To date, there are no approved pharmacological treatments for GD. The rat gambling task (rGT) is a recently developed rodent analogue of the Iowa gambling task in which rats are trained to associate four response holes with different magnitudes and probabilities of food pellet rewards and punishing time-out periods. Similar to healthy human volunteers, most rats adopt the optimal strategies (optimal group). However, a subset of animals show preference for the disadvantageous options (suboptimal group), mimicking the choice pattern of patients with GD. Here, we explored for the first time the effects of various cannabinoid ligands (WIN 55,212-2, AM 4113, AM 630 and URB 597) on the rGT. Administration of the cannabinoid agonist CB1/CB2 WIN 55,212-2 improved choice strategy and increased choice latency in the suboptimal group, but only increased perseverative behaviour, when punished, in the optimal group. Blockade of CB1 or CB2 receptors or inhibition of fatty-acid amide hydrolase did not affect rGT performance. These results suggest that stimulation of cannabinoid receptors could affect gambling choice behaviours differentially in some subgroups of subjects.
据估计,美国和加拿大0.6%-1%的人口符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)中赌博障碍(GD)的标准。迄今为止,尚无获批用于治疗GD的药物疗法。大鼠赌博任务(rGT)是最近开发的一种啮齿动物版爱荷华赌博任务,其中训练大鼠将四个反应孔与不同数量和概率的食物颗粒奖励以及惩罚性超时时间联系起来。与健康人类志愿者相似,大多数大鼠采用最优策略(最优组)。然而,一部分动物表现出对不利选项的偏好(次优组),这与GD患者的选择模式相似。在此,我们首次探究了各种大麻素配体(WIN 55,212-2、AM 4113、AM 630和URB 597)对rGT的影响。给予大麻素激动剂CB1/CB2 WIN 55,212-2可改善次优组的选择策略并增加选择潜伏期,但仅增加了最优组在受惩罚时的固执行为。阻断CB1或CB2受体或抑制脂肪酸酰胺水解酶并不影响rGT表现。这些结果表明,大麻素受体的刺激可能在某些亚组受试者中对赌博选择行为产生不同影响。