Wongkietkachorn Apinut, Rhunsiri Peera, Boonyawong Pangpoom, Lawanprasert Attaporn, Tantiphlachiva Kasaya
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Surg Educ. 2016 May-Jun;73(3):524-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.12.004. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
Tutoring in suturing was developed to compensate for a shortage of suturing cases. The objective of this study was to compare ideal suturing score (ISS; 9 points), suturing time (min:sec), and suture placement error (mm) between medical students completing the suturing tutoring program and medical students attending ordinary medical school training program.
Participants consisted of 2 groups of medical students who had never performed suturing. The study group had the role of suturing tutor to teach interested high school students. The control group consisted of volunteers from the ordinary medical school program. Skills measurement was performed by having students from both the groups perform 3 vertical mattress sutures on a model. The study group was tested at weeks 1, 9, and 10 to assess improvement. Both the groups were tested at week 10 to compare final learning outcome.
There were 41 and 40 participants in the study group and the control group, respectively. ISS was significantly improved in the study group from week 1-week 10 (7.0 ± 1.3 vs. 8.2 ± 0.9, p = 0.01). At week 10, the study group had a higher mean ISS than the control group (8.2 ± 0.9 vs. 7.8 ± 1.1, p = 0.68). Mean suturing time and mean placement error were also lower in the study group at the end of suturing training (5:1 ± 1:0 vs. 5:2 ± 1:2, p = 0.13; 7.4 ± 7.4 vs. 8.0 ± 10.8, p = 0.44).
Tutoring trainees to suture can improve a student's ability to learn how to suture.
为弥补缝合病例的短缺,开展了缝合辅导。本研究的目的是比较完成缝合辅导计划的医学生与参加普通医学院培训计划的医学生之间的理想缝合分数(ISS;9分)、缝合时间(分钟:秒)和缝线放置误差(毫米)。
参与者由两组从未进行过缝合的医学生组成。研究组担任缝合导师,教授感兴趣的高中生。对照组由普通医学院项目的志愿者组成。通过让两组学生在模型上进行3次垂直褥式缝合来进行技能测量。研究组在第1、9和10周进行测试,以评估进步情况。两组均在第10周进行测试,以比较最终学习成果。
研究组和对照组分别有41名和40名参与者。研究组从第1周到第10周的ISS显著提高(7.0±1.3对8.2±0.9,p = 0.01)。在第10周,研究组的平均ISS高于对照组(8.2±0.9对7.8±1.1,p = 0.68)。在缝合训练结束时,研究组的平均缝合时间和平均放置误差也较低(5:1±1:0对5:2±1:2,p = 0.13;7.4±7.4对8.0±10.8,p = 0.44)。
指导学员进行缝合可以提高学生学习如何缝合的能力。