Suppr超能文献

《平价医疗法案》下保险类型对患者接受腕管松解术的影响

The Effect of Insurance Type on Patient Access to Carpal Tunnel Release Under the Affordable Care Act.

作者信息

Kim Chang-Yeon, Wiznia Daniel H, Wang Yuexin, Save Ameya V, Anandasivam Nidharshan S, Swigart Carrie R, Pelker Richard R

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Apr;41(4):503-509.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of insurance type (Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance) on access to hand surgeons for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

METHODS

The research team called 240 hand surgeons in 8 states (California, Massachusetts, Ohio, New York, Florida, Georgia, Texas, and North Carolina). The caller requested an appointment for her fictitious mother to be evaluated for CTS and possible surgical management through carpal tunnel release (CTR). Each office was called 3 times to assess the responses for Medicaid, Medicare, or Blue Cross Blue Shield. From each call, we recorded whether an appointment was given and whether there were barriers to an appointment, such as the need for a referral.

RESULTS

Twenty percent of offices scheduled an appointment for a patient with Medicaid, compared with 89% for Medicare and 97% for Blue Cross Blue Shield. Patients with Medicaid had an easier time scheduling appointments (28% vs 13%) and experienced fewer requests for referrals (25% vs 67%) in states with expanded Medicaid eligibility. Neither Medicaid nor Medicare reimbursement for CTR was significantly correlated with the incidence of successful appointments. Although the difference in Medicaid and Medicare reimbursements for CTR was small, the appointment success incidence for Medicare was approximately 5 times higher.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the passage of the Affordable Care Act, patients with Medicaid have reduced access to surgical care for CTS and more complex barriers to receiving an appointment. Although Medicaid was accepted at a higher rate in states with expanded Medicaid eligibility, a more robust strategy for increasing access to care may be helpful for patients with Medicaid.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

摘要

目的

评估保险类型(医疗补助、医疗保险和私人保险)对腕管综合征(CTS)患者寻求手外科医生治疗的影响。

方法

研究团队致电8个州(加利福尼亚州、马萨诸塞州、俄亥俄州、纽约州、佛罗里达州、佐治亚州、得克萨斯州和北卡罗来纳州)的240名手外科医生。致电者为其虚构的母亲预约,以评估是否患有CTS以及是否可能通过腕管松解术(CTR)进行手术治疗。每个办公室被致电3次,以评估对医疗补助、医疗保险或蓝十字蓝盾的回应。每次致电时,我们记录是否给予预约以及预约是否存在障碍,例如是否需要转诊。

结果

20%的办公室为医疗补助患者安排了预约,相比之下,医疗保险患者的这一比例为89%,蓝十字蓝盾患者的比例为97%。在医疗补助资格扩大的州,医疗补助患者预约更容易(28%对13%),且转诊要求更少(25%对67%)。CTR的医疗补助和医疗保险报销与成功预约的发生率均无显著相关性。尽管CTR的医疗补助和医疗保险报销差异不大,但医疗保险的预约成功率约高5倍。

结论

尽管《平价医疗法案》已通过,但医疗补助患者接受CTS手术治疗的机会减少,且获得预约存在更复杂的障碍。尽管在医疗补助资格扩大的州,医疗补助的接受率更高,但制定更有力的增加医疗服务可及性的策略可能有助于医疗补助患者。

研究类型/证据水平:预后性II级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验