Lucci G, Berchicci M, Perri R L, Spinelli D, Di Russo F
Department of Psychology, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy; IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome 00179, Italy.
Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome 00135, Italy.
Neuroscience. 2016 May 13;322:121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
Studies on perceptual decision-making showed that manipulating the proportion of target and non-target stimuli affects the behavioral performance. Tasks with high frequency of targets are associated to faster response times (RTs) conjunctively to higher number of errors (reflecting a response bias characterized by speed/accuracy trade-off) when compared to conditions with low frequency of targets. Electroencephalographic studies well described modulations of post-stimulus event-related potentials as effect of the stimulus probability; in contrast, in the present study we focused on the pre-stimulus preparatory activities subtending the response bias. Two versions of a Go/No-go task characterized by different proportion of Go stimuli (88% vs. 12%) were adopted. In the task with frequent go trials, we observed a strong enhancement in the motor preparation as indexed by the Bereitschaftspotential (BP, previously associated with activity within the supplementary motor area), faster RTs, and larger commission error rate than in the task with rare go trials. Contemporarily with the BP, a right lateralized prefrontal negativity (lateral pN, previously associated with activity within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) was larger in the task with rare go trial. In the post-stimulus processing stage, we confirmed that the N2 and the P3 components were larger for rare trials, irrespective of the Go/No-go stimulus category. The increase of activities recorded in the preparatory phase related to frequency of targets is consistent with the view proposed in accumulation models of perceptual decision for which target frequency affects the subjective baseline, reducing the distance between the starting-point and the response boundary, which determines the response speed.
关于知觉决策的研究表明,操纵目标刺激和非目标刺激的比例会影响行为表现。与目标刺激频率较低的情况相比,目标刺激频率较高的任务与更快的反应时间(RTs)相关联,但同时错误数量也更多(反映了以速度/准确性权衡为特征的反应偏差)。脑电图研究很好地描述了刺激后事件相关电位随刺激概率的调制;相比之下,在本研究中,我们关注的是构成反应偏差的刺激前准备活动。采用了两种版本的Go/No-go任务,其特点是Go刺激的比例不同(88%对12%)。在频繁进行Go试验的任务中,我们观察到,与罕见Go试验的任务相比, Bereitschaft电位(BP,先前与辅助运动区内的活动相关)所指示的运动准备有显著增强、反应时间更快,以及错误 commission率更高。与BP同时出现的是,在罕见Go试验的任务中,右侧前额叶负电位(外侧pN,先前与背外侧前额叶皮质内的活动相关)更大。在刺激后处理阶段,我们证实,无论Go/No-go刺激类别如何,罕见试验的N2和P3成分都更大。在准备阶段记录的与目标频率相关的活动增加,与知觉决策积累模型中提出的观点一致,即目标频率会影响主观基线,减少起点与反应边界之间的距离,从而决定反应速度。