Suppr超能文献

评估医院药物系统以保障患者安全:在怀塔玛塔地区卫生局试用澳大利亚改良工具的结果与经验教训

Assessing a hospital medication system for patient safety: findings and lessons learnt from trialling an Australian modified tool at Waitemata District Health Board.

作者信息

Ng Jerome, Andrew Penny, Crawley Marilyn, Pevreal Wynn, Peach Jocelyn

机构信息

Quality, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2016 Feb 19;129(1430):63-77.

Abstract

AIM

To undertake a review of Waitemata District Health Board's (WDHB) hospital medication system for patient safety assessment and improvement purposes.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group rated current WDHB hospital medication systems against the Medication Safety Self-Assessment for Australian Hospitals (MSSA-AH) criterion of 247 aspirational practices using a five point scale ("no" to "fully implemented"). Items with a lesser extent of implementation represented practice gaps. The MSSA-AH database and weighted adjustment scoring system generated an overall hospital score.

RESULTS

Of the maximum possible score that could be obtained had all MSSA-AH practices been implemented, WDHB scored 63% and this was comparable to other demographically similar hospitals in Australia. Lowest scoring practices needing improvement related to staffing. Conflict resolution was a previously unidentified practice gap. Previously identified gaps, such as those relating to electronic medication systems suggested ongoing implementation was required.

CONCLUSION

This was the first documented use of the MSSA-AH's in a New Zealand hospital setting and helped WDHB identify areas in need of further improvement. The unique generation of a percentage score helped simplify understanding for non-technical stakeholders. Future repeated assessments would help WDHB track progress. Implicit benefits, such as stakeholder engagement, were observed. The MSSA-AH may be useful in other hospital settings.

摘要

目的

对怀塔玛塔地区卫生局(WDHB)的医院用药系统进行审查,以评估患者安全并进行改进。

方法

一个多学科小组根据澳大利亚医院用药安全自我评估(MSSA - AH)的247项理想做法标准,使用五点量表(从“未实施”到“完全实施”)对WDHB当前的医院用药系统进行评分。实施程度较低的项目代表了实践差距。MSSA - AH数据库和加权调整评分系统得出了医院的总体得分。

结果

如果所有MSSA - AH做法都得到实施,WDHB可能获得的最高分数为63%,这与澳大利亚其他人口统计学特征相似的医院相当。得分最低、需要改进的做法与人员配备有关。冲突解决是一个先前未被识别的实践差距。先前已识别的差距,如与电子用药系统相关的差距,表明仍需持续实施。

结论

这是MSSA - AH在新西兰医院环境中的首次文献记载应用,有助于WDHB识别需要进一步改进的领域。独特的百分比得分生成方式有助于非技术利益相关者简化理解。未来的重复评估将有助于WDHB跟踪进展。观察到了一些隐含的好处,如利益相关者的参与。MSSA - AH可能在其他医院环境中有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验