Darby Ian, Xu Cheng-Yuan, Wallace Helen M, Joseph Stephen, Pace Ben, Bai Shahla Hosseini
Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD, 4558, Australia.
Environmental Futures Research Institute, School of Natural Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD, 4111, Australia.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jun;23(11):11267-11278. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6336-7. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
This study aims to examine the effects of different organic treatments including compost (generated from cattle hide waste and plant material), compost mixed with biochar (compost + biochar) and a new formulation of organo-mineral biochar (produced by mixing biochar with clay, minerals and chicken manure) on carbon (C) nitrogen (N) cycling. We used compost at the rate of 20 t ha(-1), compost 20 t ha(-1) mixed with 10 t ha(-1) biochar (compost + biochar) and organo-mineral biochar which also contained 10 t ha(-1) biochar. Control samples received neither of the treatments. Compost and compost + biochar increased NH4 (+) -N concentrations for a short time, mainly due to the release of their NH4 (+) -N content. Compost + biochar did not alter N cycling of the compost significantly but did significantly increase CO2 emission compared to control. Compost significantly increased N2O emission compared to control. Compost + biochar did not significantly change N supply and also did not decrease CO2 and N2O emissions compared to compost, suggesting probably higher rates of biochar may be required to be added to the compost to significantly affect compost-induced C and N alteration. The organo-mineral biochar had no effect on N cycling and did not stimulate CO2 and N2O emission compared to the control. However, organo-mineral biochar maintained significantly higher dissolved organic carbon (DOC) than compost and compost + biochar from after day 14 to the end of the incubation. Biochar used in organo-mineral biochar had increased organic C adsorption which may become available eventually. However, increased DOC in organo-mineral biochar probably originated from both biochar and chicken manure which was not differentiated in this experiment. Hence, in our experiment, compost, compost + biochar and organo-mineral biochar affected C and N cycling differently mainly due to their different content.
本研究旨在考察不同有机处理方式,包括堆肥(由牛皮废料和植物材料制成)、堆肥与生物炭混合(堆肥 + 生物炭)以及一种新型有机矿物生物炭配方(通过将生物炭与粘土、矿物质和鸡粪混合制成)对碳(C)氮(N)循环的影响。我们使用的堆肥施用量为20吨/公顷,20吨/公顷堆肥与10吨/公顷生物炭混合(堆肥 + 生物炭),有机矿物生物炭中生物炭的用量同样为10吨/公顷。对照样本未进行任何处理。堆肥和堆肥 + 生物炭在短时间内提高了NH4(+) -N浓度,主要是由于其NH4(+) -N含量的释放。堆肥 + 生物炭并未显著改变堆肥的氮循环,但与对照相比显著增加了二氧化碳排放。与对照相比,堆肥显著增加了氧化亚氮排放。堆肥 + 生物炭与堆肥相比,未显著改变氮供应,也未减少二氧化碳和氧化亚氮排放,这表明可能需要向堆肥中添加更高比例的生物炭才能显著影响堆肥引起的碳和氮变化。与对照相比,有机矿物生物炭对氮循环没有影响,也未刺激二氧化碳和氧化亚氮排放。然而,从培养第14天到培养结束,有机矿物生物炭中的溶解有机碳(DOC)显著高于堆肥和堆肥 + 生物炭。有机矿物生物炭中使用的生物炭增加了有机碳吸附,最终可能会释放出来。然而,有机矿物生物炭中DOC的增加可能源于生物炭和鸡粪,在本实验中未对此进行区分。因此,在我们的实验中,堆肥、堆肥 + 生物炭和有机矿物生物炭对碳和氮循环的影响不同,主要是由于它们的成分不同。