Suppr超能文献

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌多部位监测:文献系统评价

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus multiple sites surveillance: a systemic review of the literature.

作者信息

Chipolombwe John, Török Mili Estee, Mbelle Nontombi, Nyasulu Peter

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Mzuzu Central Hospital, Ministry of Health, Mzuzu, Malawi.

Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Infect Drug Resist. 2016 Feb 12;9:35-42. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S95372. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the optimal number of sampling sites for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization.

METHODS

We performed a Medline search from January 1966 to February 2014 for articles that reported the prevalence of MRSA at different body sites. Studies were characterized by study design, country and period of the study, number of patients and/or isolates of MRSA, specimen type, sites of MRSA isolation, study population sampled, diagnostic testing method, and percentage of the MRSA isolates at each site in relation to the total number of sites.

RESULTS

We reviewed 3,211 abstracts and 177 manuscripts, of which 17 met the criteria for analysis (n=52,642 patients). MRSA colonization prevalence varied from 8% to 99% at different body sites. The nasal cavity as a single site had MRSA detection sensitivity of 68% (34%-91%). The throat and nares gave the highest detection rates as single sites. A combination of two swabs improved MRSA detection rates with the best combination being groin/throat (89.6%; 62.5%-100%). A combination of three swab sites improved MRSA detection rate to 94.2% (81%-100%) with the best combination being groin/nose/throat. Certain combinations were associated with low detection rates. MRSA detection rates also varied with different culture methods.

CONCLUSION

A combination of three swabs from different body sites resulted in the highest detection rate for MRSA colonization. The use of three swab sites would likely improve the recognition and treatment of MRSA colonization, which may in turn reduce infection and transmission of MRSA to other patients.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)定植的最佳采样部位数量。

方法

我们对1966年1月至2014年2月期间的Medline数据库进行检索,查找报告不同身体部位MRSA患病率的文章。研究的特征包括研究设计、研究的国家和时期、患者数量和/或MRSA分离株数量、标本类型、MRSA分离部位、采样的研究人群、诊断检测方法以及每个部位的MRSA分离株占总部位数的百分比。

结果

我们审查了3211篇摘要和177篇手稿,其中17篇符合分析标准(n = 52642名患者)。不同身体部位的MRSA定植患病率从8%到99%不等。鼻腔作为单一部位的MRSA检测灵敏度为68%(34% - 91%)。咽喉和鼻腔作为单一部位时检测率最高。两根拭子联合使用可提高MRSA检测率,最佳组合是腹股沟/咽喉(89.6%;62.5% - 100%)。三个拭子部位联合使用可将MRSA检测率提高到94.2%(81% - 100%),最佳组合是腹股沟/鼻腔/咽喉。某些组合的检测率较低。MRSA检测率也因不同的培养方法而有所不同。

结论

来自不同身体部位的三根拭子联合使用可使MRSA定植的检测率最高。使用三个拭子部位可能会改善对MRSA定植的识别和治疗,进而可能减少MRSA感染及向其他患者的传播。

相似文献

1
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus multiple sites surveillance: a systemic review of the literature.
Infect Drug Resist. 2016 Feb 12;9:35-42. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S95372. eCollection 2016.
2
Can we reduce the number of MRSA screening site swabs in elective orthopedic patients?
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 May-Aug;27(2):2309499019847068. doi: 10.1177/2309499019847068.
3
Optimization of multiple muco-cutaneous site sampling method for screening MRSA colonization in ICU.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;17(4):243-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.118421.
6
Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization using sponges.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;36(1):28-33. doi: 10.1017/ice.2014.4.
9
Nasal swab screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus--how well does it perform? A cross-sectional study.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;33(8):803-8. doi: 10.1086/666639. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

2
Colonisation with multidrug-resistant organisms among dialysis patients at Universitas Academic Hospital.
S Afr J Infect Dis. 2024 Jul 9;39(1):607. doi: 10.4102/sajid.v39i1.607. eCollection 2024.
3
Methicillin-resistant Infection and its Health Perspective: A Review.
Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2025;26(9):1331-1347. doi: 10.2174/0113892010310231240529075731.
4
Targeting bacterial growth in biofilm conditions: rational design of novel inhibitors to mitigate clinical and food contamination using QSAR.
J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2024 Dec;39(1):2330907. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2024.2330907. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
6
Carbapenem-resistant : A challenge in the intensive care unit.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Nov 10;13:1045206. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1045206. eCollection 2022.
7
The nose is not enough: Multi-site sampling is best for MRSP detection in dogs and households.
Vet Dermatol. 2022 Dec;33(6):576-580. doi: 10.1111/vde.13118. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
9
Predictive Role of Targeted, Active Surveillance Cultures for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant .
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Nov 12;14:4757-4764. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S340871. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

4
Optimization of multiple muco-cutaneous site sampling method for screening MRSA colonization in ICU.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;17(4):243-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.118421.
6
Risk factors for development of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection among colonized patients.
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Jul;41(7):625-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.08.005. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
7
Which anatomical sites should be sampled for screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage by culture or by rapid PCR test?
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Feb;18(2):E31-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03724.x. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
9
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization at different body sites: a prospective, quantitative analysis.
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Mar;49(3):1119-21. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02601-10. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验