Suppr超能文献

GRADE指南:16. 临床实践和公共卫生中检测的GRADE证据到决策框架。

GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health.

作者信息

Schünemann Holger J, Mustafa Reem, Brozek Jan, Santesso Nancy, Alonso-Coello Pablo, Guyatt Gordon, Scholten Rob, Langendam Miranda, Leeflang Mariska M, Akl Elie A, Singh Jasvinder A, Meerpohl Joerg, Hultcrantz Monica, Bossuyt Patrick, Oxman Andrew D

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics & McGRADE Center, 1280 Main Street West McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada; Cochrane GRADEing (Applicability and Recommendations) Methods Group, 1280 Main Street West McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics & McGRADE Center, 1280 Main Street West McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada; Cochrane GRADEing (Applicability and Recommendations) Methods Group, 1280 Main Street West McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, M4-303, 2411 Holmes Street, Kansas City, MO 64108-2792, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.032. Epub 2016 Feb 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) interactive evidence to decision (EtD) frameworks for tests and test strategies for clinical, public health, or coverage decisions.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

As part of the GRADE Working Group's DECIDE project, we conducted workshops, user testing with systematic review authors, guideline developers and other decision makers, and piloted versions of the EtD framework.

RESULTS

EtD frameworks for tests share the structure, explicitness, and transparency of other EtD frameworks. They require specifying the purpose of the test, linked or related management, and the key outcomes of concern for different test results and subsequent management. The EtD criteria address test accuracy and assessments of the certainty of the additional evidence necessary for decision making. When there is no direct evidence of test effects on patient-important outcomes, formal or informal modeling is needed to estimate effects. We describe the EtD criteria based on examples developed with GRADEpro (www.gradepro.org), GRADE's software that also allows development and dissemination of interactive summary of findings tables.

CONCLUSION

EtD frameworks for developing recommendations and making decisions about tests lay out the sequential steps in reviewing and assessing the different types of evidence that need to be linked.

摘要

目标

描述用于临床、公共卫生或保险范围决策的检测及检测策略的推荐评估、制定与评价分级(GRADE)交互式证据到决策(EtD)框架。

研究设计与背景

作为GRADE工作组DECIDE项目的一部分,我们举办了研讨会,对系统评价作者、指南制定者及其他决策者进行了用户测试,并对EtD框架的版本进行了试点。

结果

检测的EtD框架具备其他EtD框架的结构、明晰性和透明度。它们要求明确检测目的、相关管理以及不同检测结果和后续管理所关注的关键结局。EtD标准涉及检测准确性以及对决策所需额外证据确定性的评估。当没有关于检测对患者重要结局影响的直接证据时,需要进行正式或非正式建模来估计影响。我们基于使用GRADEpro(www.gradepro.org)开发的示例来描述EtD标准,GRADE的该软件还允许开发和传播交互式结果总结表。

结论

用于制定关于检测的推荐和决策的EtD框架列出了审查和评估需要关联的不同类型证据的连续步骤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验