Meijers W C, Hoekstra T, Jaarsma T, van Veldhuisen D J, de Boer R A
Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Faculty of health sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Neth Heart J. 2016 Apr;24(4):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s12471-016-0816-8.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common and its management remains difficult. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are used to diagnose heart failure, and as an entry criterion for inclusion into trials. We investigated a population of HFpEF patients who had been randomised into a study based on clinical parameters, and compared those with low BNP levels to those with elevated BNP levels.
We examined patients who had been enrolled in the Coordinating study evaluating Outcomes of Advising and Counselling in Heart Failure (COACH), with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 40 %), and compared those with low BNP (< 100 pg/ml; n = 30) to those with elevated BNP (≥ 100 pg/ml; n = 127). Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, biomarkers, quality of life, and outcome parameters (hospitalisations and death) were compared between the groups. To validate our findings, we repeated all analyses for NT-proBNP (< 300 pg/ml and ≥ 300 pg/ml).
Patients were similar with regard to most clinical characteristics (including age, sex, and LVEF), biomarkers, and comorbidities. In contrast, patients with a low BNP had higher body mass index levels (31 kg/m(2) vs. 27 kg/m(2); p < 0.01) and lower cardiac troponin I (9 pg/ml vs. 15 pg/ml; p = 0.02). In addition, these patients were less frequently prescribed diuretics and beta-blockers. No differences in quality of life, heart failure related symptoms and the primary and secondary outcomes were observed between these groups. These observations were confirmed for NT-proBNP.
Among the patients with clinically diagnosed HFpEF, those with low BNP are strikingly similar to those with elevated BNP levels, except for BMI, which was significantly higher in these patients.
射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)很常见,其治疗仍然困难。B型利钠肽(BNP)水平用于诊断心力衰竭,并作为纳入试验的入选标准。我们研究了一组基于临床参数被随机纳入一项研究的HFpEF患者,并将BNP水平低的患者与BNP水平升高的患者进行比较。
我们检查了参与心力衰竭咨询与辅导结果协调研究(COACH)、左心室射血分数保留(LVEF≥40%)的患者,并将BNP水平低(<100 pg/ml;n = 30)的患者与BNP水平升高(≥100 pg/ml;n = 127)的患者进行比较。比较两组之间的基线特征、合并症、生物标志物、生活质量和结局参数(住院和死亡)。为了验证我们的发现,我们对NT-proBNP(<300 pg/ml和≥300 pg/ml)重复了所有分析。
两组患者在大多数临床特征(包括年龄、性别和LVEF)、生物标志物和合并症方面相似。相比之下,BNP水平低的患者体重指数较高(31 kg/m² 对27 kg/m²;p<0.01),心肌肌钙蛋白I较低(9 pg/ml对15 pg/ml;p = 0.02)。此外,这些患者使用利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂的频率较低。两组之间在生活质量、心力衰竭相关症状以及主要和次要结局方面未观察到差异。这些观察结果在NT-proBNP分析中得到证实。
在临床诊断为HFpEF的患者中,BNP水平低的患者与BNP水平升高的患者惊人地相似,但这些患者的BMI显著更高除外。