Sharifi Rouhallah, Ryu Choong-Min
Molecular Phytobacteriology Laboratory, Super-Bacteria Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and BiotechnologyDaejeon, South Korea; Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi UniversityKermanshah, Iran.
Molecular Phytobacteriology Laboratory, Super-Bacteria Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and BiotechnologyDaejeon, South Korea; Biosystems and Bioengineering Program, University of Science and TechnologyDaejeon, South Korea.
Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb 23;7:196. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00196. eCollection 2016.
Biological control (biocontrol) agents act on plants via numerous mechanisms, and can be used to protect plants from pathogens. Biocontrol agents can act directly as pathogen antagonists or competitors or indirectly to promote plant induced systemic resistance (ISR). Whether a biocontrol agent acts directly or indirectly depends on the specific strain and the pathosystem type. We reported previously that bacterial volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are determinants for eliciting plant ISR. Emerging data suggest that bacterial VOCs also can directly inhibit fungal and plant growth. The aim of the current study was to differentiate direct and indirect mechanisms of bacterial VOC effects against Botrytis cinerea infection of Arabidopsis. Volatile emissions from Bacillus subtilis GB03 successfully protected Arabidopsis seedlings against B. cinerea. First, we investigated the direct effects of bacterial VOCs on symptom development and different phenological stages of B. cinerea including spore germination, mycelial attachment to the leaf surface, mycelial growth, and sporulation in vitro and in planta. Volatile emissions inhibited hyphal growth in a dose-dependent manner in vitro, and interfered with fungal attachment on the hydrophobic leaf surface. Second, the optimized bacterial concentration that did not directly inhibit fungal growth successfully protected Arabidopsis from fungal infection, which indicates that bacterial VOC-elicited plant ISR has a more important role in biocontrol than direct inhibition of fungal growth on Arabidopsis. We performed qRT-PCR to investigate the priming of the defense-related genes PR1, PDF1.2, and ChiB at 0, 12, 24, and 36 h post-infection and 14 days after the start of plant exposure to bacterial VOCs. The results indicate that bacterial VOCs potentiate expression of PR1 and PDF1.2 but not ChiB, which stimulates SA- and JA-dependent signaling pathways in plant ISR and protects plants against pathogen colonization. This study provides new evidence for bacterial VOC-elicited plant ISR that protects Arabidopsis plants from infection by the necrotrophic fungus B. cinerea. Our work reveals that bacterial VOCs primarily act via an indirect mechanism to elicit plant ISR, and have a major role in biocontrol against fungal pathogens.
生物防治剂通过多种机制作用于植物,可用于保护植物免受病原体侵害。生物防治剂可直接作为病原体拮抗剂或竞争者发挥作用,也可间接促进植物诱导的系统抗性(ISR)。生物防治剂是直接还是间接发挥作用取决于特定菌株和病理系统类型。我们之前报道过,细菌挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)是引发植物ISR的决定因素。新出现的数据表明,细菌VOCs也可直接抑制真菌和植物生长。本研究的目的是区分细菌VOCs对拟南芥灰霉病感染的直接和间接作用机制。枯草芽孢杆菌GB03释放的挥发性物质成功保护了拟南芥幼苗免受灰霉病菌侵害。首先,我们研究了细菌VOCs对灰霉病菌症状发展和不同物候阶段的直接影响,包括孢子萌发、菌丝在叶表面的附着、菌丝生长以及体外和体内的产孢。挥发性物质在体外以剂量依赖的方式抑制菌丝生长,并干扰真菌在疏水叶表面的附着。其次,未直接抑制真菌生长的优化细菌浓度成功保护拟南芥免受真菌感染,这表明细菌VOCs诱导的植物ISR在生物防治中比直接抑制拟南芥上的真菌生长发挥更重要的作用。我们进行了qRT-PCR,以研究在感染后0、12、24和36小时以及植物开始暴露于细菌VOCs后14天,防御相关基因PR1、PDF1.2和ChiB的启动情况。结果表明,细菌VOCs增强了PR1和PDF1.2的表达,但没有增强ChiB的表达,这刺激了植物ISR中SA和JA依赖的信号通路,并保护植物免受病原体定殖。本研究为细菌VOCs诱导的植物ISR提供了新证据,该ISR保护拟南芥植物免受坏死营养型真菌灰霉病菌的感染。我们的工作表明,细菌VOCs主要通过间接机制引发植物ISR,并在对抗真菌病原体的生物防治中发挥重要作用。