Graham Emily B, Knelman Joseph E, Schindlbacher Andreas, Siciliano Steven, Breulmann Marc, Yannarell Anthony, Beman J M, Abell Guy, Philippot Laurent, Prosser James, Foulquier Arnaud, Yuste Jorge C, Glanville Helen C, Jones Davey L, Angel Roey, Salminen Janne, Newton Ryan J, Bürgmann Helmut, Ingram Lachlan J, Hamer Ute, Siljanen Henri M P, Peltoniemi Krista, Potthast Karin, Bañeras Lluís, Hartmann Martin, Banerjee Samiran, Yu Ri-Qing, Nogaro Geraldine, Richter Andreas, Koranda Marianne, Castle Sarah C, Goberna Marta, Song Bongkeun, Chatterjee Amitava, Nunes Olga C, Lopes Ana R, Cao Yiping, Kaisermann Aurore, Hallin Sara, Strickland Michael S, Garcia-Pausas Jordi, Barba Josep, Kang Hojeong, Isobe Kazuo, Papaspyrou Sokratis, Pastorelli Roberta, Lagomarsino Alessandra, Lindström Eva S, Basiliko Nathan, Nemergut Diana R
Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder, BoulderCO, USA; Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, RichlandWA, USA.
Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder, BoulderCO, USA; US Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut CreekCA, USA.
Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb 24;7:214. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00214. eCollection 2016.
Microorganisms are vital in mediating the earth's biogeochemical cycles; yet, despite our rapidly increasing ability to explore complex environmental microbial communities, the relationship between microbial community structure and ecosystem processes remains poorly understood. Here, we address a fundamental and unanswered question in microbial ecology: 'When do we need to understand microbial community structure to accurately predict function?' We present a statistical analysis investigating the value of environmental data and microbial community structure independently and in combination for explaining rates of carbon and nitrogen cycling processes within 82 global datasets. Environmental variables were the strongest predictors of process rates but left 44% of variation unexplained on average, suggesting the potential for microbial data to increase model accuracy. Although only 29% of our datasets were significantly improved by adding information on microbial community structure, we observed improvement in models of processes mediated by narrow phylogenetic guilds via functional gene data, and conversely, improvement in models of facultative microbial processes via community diversity metrics. Our results also suggest that microbial diversity can strengthen predictions of respiration rates beyond microbial biomass parameters, as 53% of models were improved by incorporating both sets of predictors compared to 35% by microbial biomass alone. Our analysis represents the first comprehensive analysis of research examining links between microbial community structure and ecosystem function. Taken together, our results indicate that a greater understanding of microbial communities informed by ecological principles may enhance our ability to predict ecosystem process rates relative to assessments based on environmental variables and microbial physiology.
微生物在介导地球生物地球化学循环中至关重要;然而,尽管我们探索复杂环境微生物群落的能力迅速提高,但微生物群落结构与生态系统过程之间的关系仍知之甚少。在此,我们解决微生物生态学中一个基本且未得到解答的问题:“何时我们需要了解微生物群落结构才能准确预测功能?”我们进行了一项统计分析,独立且综合地研究环境数据和微生物群落结构对于解释82个全球数据集中碳和氮循环过程速率的价值。环境变量是过程速率的最强预测因子,但平均仍有44%的变异无法解释,这表明微生物数据有提高模型准确性的潜力。尽管通过添加微生物群落结构信息,只有29%的数据集得到显著改善,但我们观察到,通过功能基因数据,由狭义系统发育类群介导的过程模型有所改进,相反,通过群落多样性指标,兼性微生物过程模型也有所改进。我们的结果还表明,微生物多样性可以加强对呼吸速率的预测,超越微生物生物量参数,因为与仅使用微生物生物量时35%的模型得到改进相比,53%的模型通过纳入两组预测因子而得到改进。我们的分析代表了对研究微生物群落结构与生态系统功能之间联系的首次全面分析。综合来看,我们的结果表明,基于生态原理对微生物群落有更深入的了解,相对于基于环境变量和微生物生理学的评估,可能会增强我们预测生态系统过程速率的能力。