Bellucci Gabriele, Chernyak Sergey, Hoffman Morris, Deshpande Gopikrishna, Dal Monte Olga, Knutson Kristine M, Grafman Jordan, Krueger Frank
a Molecular Neuroscience Department , George Mason University , Fairfax , VA , USA.
b Berlin School of Mind and Brain , Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin , Berlin , Germany.
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Apr;12(2):124-134. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1153518. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
Third-party punishment (TPP) for norm violations is an essential deterrent in large-scale human societies, and builds on two essential cognitive functions: evaluating legal responsibility and determining appropriate punishment. Despite converging evidence that TPP is mediated by a specific set of brain regions, little is known about their effective connectivity (direction and strength of connections). Applying parametric event-related functional MRI in conjunction with multivariate Granger causality analysis, we asked healthy participants to estimate how much punishment a hypothetical perpetrator deserves for intentionally committing criminal offenses varying in levels of harm. Our results confirmed that TPP legal decisions are based on two domain-general networks: the mentalizing network for evaluating legal responsibility and the central-executive network for determining appropriate punishment. Further, temporal pole (TP) and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (PFC) emerged as hubs of the mentalizing network, uniquely generating converging output connections to ventromedial PFC, temporo-parietal junction, and posterior cingulate. In particular, dorsomedial PFC received inputs only from TP and both its activation and its connectivity to dorsolateral PFC correlated with degree of punishment. This supports the hypothesis that dorsomedial PFC acts as the driver of the TPP activation pattern, leading to the decision on the appropriate punishment. In conclusion, these results advance our understanding of the organizational elements of the TPP brain networks and provide better insights into the mental states of judges and jurors tasked with blaming and punishing legal wrongs.
对违规行为的第三方惩罚(TPP)是大规模人类社会中的一种重要威慑手段,它基于两种基本的认知功能:评估法律责任和确定适当的惩罚。尽管越来越多的证据表明TPP是由一组特定的脑区介导的,但对于它们的有效连接性(连接的方向和强度)却知之甚少。我们运用参数化事件相关功能磁共振成像结合多变量格兰杰因果分析,让健康参与者估计一个假设的犯罪者因故意实施不同伤害程度的犯罪行为应受到多少惩罚。我们的结果证实,TPP法律决策基于两个领域通用网络:用于评估法律责任的心理化网络和用于确定适当惩罚的中央执行网络。此外,颞极(TP)和背内侧前额叶皮层(PFC)成为心理化网络的枢纽,独特地产生汇聚到腹内侧PFC、颞顶联合区和后扣带回的输出连接。特别是,背内侧PFC仅从TP接收输入,其激活以及与背外侧PFC的连接都与惩罚程度相关。这支持了背内侧PFC作为TPP激活模式驱动者的假设,从而导致对适当惩罚的决定。总之,这些结果推进了我们对TPP脑网络组织要素的理解,并为负责指责和惩罚法律过错的法官和陪审员的心理状态提供了更好的见解。