Kreft B
Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Hautarzt. 2016 May;67(5):352-8. doi: 10.1007/s00105-016-3775-5.
Nowadays, for modern electrotherapy of cardiac arrhythmias different pacemaker systems are used. Antibradycardia pacing systems (e. g. single-chamber, two-chamber, three-chamber systems, frequency-adapted pacemaker) can be distinguished from antitachycardia pacing systems like implantable or portable cardioverter defibrillators and combined antibradycardia/antitachycardia systems. Cutaneous reactions overlying a pacemaker or defibrillator are often termed "pacemaker dermatitis". In terms of the differential diagnostic workup, these cutaneous reactions can have various causes. After exclusion of infection by analyzing clinical and laboratory-chemical results, "pressure dermatitis" or the often clinically asymptomatic "reticular telangiectatic erythema" (synonym "postimplantation erythema") must be considered. Histological examination of the affected skin can contribute to the diagnosis. In case of suspected contact hypersensitivity to implant material, allergological exploration should be realized. In addition to patch testing with commercially available contact allergens, product-related material metal alloy discs are often available from the pacemaker manufacturer for epicutaneous testing. Due to the lack of additional benefit compared to standardized patch testing, a clear recommendation for such metal alloy discs cannot be given. In selected cases of suspected hypersensitivity reaction, sensitization can eventually be analyzed by the lymphocyte transformation test. Positive reactions must always be critically interpreted taking into consideration the corresponding clinical signs. Depending on the cause, cutaneous reactions are occasionally self-limiting. In many cases, however, removal of the pacemaker is inevitable.
如今,在现代心律失常电疗法中使用了不同的起搏器系统。抗心动过缓起搏系统(例如单腔、双腔、三腔系统、频率适应性起搏器)可与抗心动过速起搏系统(如植入式或便携式心脏复律除颤器)以及联合抗心动过缓/抗心动过速系统区分开来。起搏器或除颤器上方的皮肤反应通常称为“起搏器性皮炎”。在鉴别诊断检查方面,这些皮肤反应可能有多种原因。在通过分析临床和实验室化学结果排除感染后,必须考虑“压力性皮炎”或临床上通常无症状的“网状毛细血管扩张性红斑”(同义词“植入后红斑”)。对受影响皮肤进行组织学检查有助于诊断。如果怀疑对植入材料有接触性过敏,应进行变应原学检查。除了用市售接触性变应原进行斑贴试验外,起搏器制造商通常还提供与产品相关的材料金属合金盘用于皮上试验。由于与标准化斑贴试验相比没有额外益处,因此不能对这种金属合金盘给出明确推荐。在某些疑似过敏反应的病例中,最终可通过淋巴细胞转化试验分析致敏情况。阳性反应必须始终结合相应的临床体征进行审慎解释。根据病因,皮肤反应偶尔会自行消退。然而,在许多情况下,不可避免地要移除起搏器。