Suppr超能文献

少数群体压力、群体层面应对方式及社会支持对德国男同性恋者心理健康的影响

Effects of Minority Stress, Group-Level Coping, and Social Support on Mental Health of German Gay Men.

作者信息

Sattler Frank A, Wagner Ulrich, Christiansen Hanna

机构信息

Department of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Department of Social Psychology and Center for Conflict Studies, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 4;11(3):e0150562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150562. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

According to epidemiological studies, gay men are at a higher risk of mental disorders than heterosexual men. In the current study, the minority stress theory was investigated in German gay men: 1) it was hypothesized that minority stressors would positively predict mental health problems and that 2) group-level coping and social support variables would moderate these predictions negatively.

METHODS

Data from 1,188 German self-identified gay men were collected online. The questionnaire included items about socio-demographics, minority stress (victimization, rejection sensitivity, and internalized homonegativity), group-level coping (disclosure of sexual orientation, homopositivity, gay affirmation, gay rights support, and gay rights activism), and social support (gay social support and non-gay social support). A moderated multiple regression was conducted.

RESULTS

Minority stressors positively predicted mental health problems. Group-level coping did not interact with minority stressors, with the exception of disclosure and homopositivity interacting marginally with some minority stressors. Further, only two interactions were found for social support variables and minority stress, one of them marginal. Gay and non-gay social support inversely predicted mental health problems. In addition, disclosure and homopositivity marginally predicted mental health problems.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings imply that the minority stress theory should be modified. Disclosure does not have a relevant effect on mental health, while social support variables directly influence mental health of gay men. Group-level coping does not interact with minority stressors relevantly, and only one relevant interaction between social support and minority stress was found. Further longitudinal or experimental replication is needed before transferring the results to mental health interventions and prevention strategies for gay men.

摘要

目的

根据流行病学研究,男同性恋者患精神障碍的风险高于异性恋男性。在本研究中,对德国男同性恋者的少数群体压力理论进行了调查:1)假设少数群体压力源能正向预测心理健康问题,且2)群体层面的应对和社会支持变量会对这些预测产生负向调节作用。

方法

通过网络收集了1188名自我认定为男同性恋的德国男性的数据。问卷包括社会人口统计学、少数群体压力(受害、拒绝敏感性和内化的同性恋消极态度)、群体层面的应对(性取向披露、同性恋积极态度、同性恋肯定、同性恋权利支持和同性恋权利行动主义)以及社会支持(同性恋社会支持和非同性恋社会支持)等项目。进行了调节多元回归分析。

结果

少数群体压力源正向预测心理健康问题。群体层面的应对与少数群体压力源之间没有相互作用,但披露和同性恋积极态度与一些少数群体压力源存在微弱的相互作用。此外,社会支持变量与少数群体压力之间仅发现了两个相互作用,其中一个是微弱的。同性恋和非同性恋社会支持反向预测心理健康问题。此外,披露和同性恋积极态度微弱地预测心理健康问题。

结论

研究结果表明,少数群体压力理论应予以修正。披露对心理健康没有相关影响,而社会支持变量直接影响男同性恋者的心理健康。群体层面的应对与少数群体压力源没有显著的相互作用,社会支持与少数群体压力之间仅发现了一个显著的相互作用。在将结果应用于男同性恋者的心理健康干预和预防策略之前,需要进一步进行纵向或实验性重复研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c39/4778907/3e6ec7c0470e/pone.0150562.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验